698

submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by spujb@lemmy.cafe to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone

146 comments fedilink hide all child comments

see if your instance is one of them here: https://fedipact.veganism.social/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] ProgrammingSocks@pawb.social 6 points 11 months ago

Wasn't federated, or was federated?

[-] Neato@ttrpg.network 3 points 11 months ago

I've always got to invert the double negatives to parse crap like this:

I probably would use an instance if it was federated to Threads.

Not exactly the same meaning, but it gets you on the right side of the negatives.

[-] SwagGaribaldi@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

Yup, that's what I meant, but like you said, it doesn't carry the exact same meaning if I wrote it like that

[-] ProgrammingSocks@pawb.social 1 points 11 months ago

I understood the meaning. I was clarifying the point OP was trying to make because I 100% disagree with it as worded.

[-] h14h@midwest.social 1 points 11 months ago

Best way to address this is to reword a bit:

I probably would ~~not use~~ avoid using an instance that wasn't federated to Threads

Using "not" twice in a single sentence is generally something worth avoiding IMO.

this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2024

698 points (100.0% liked)

196

16746 readers

1820 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS