132
Big Galaxy S24 leak reveals Samsung's strategy against Google's Pixel phone
(www.androidcentral.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2024
132 points (91.2% liked)
Android
27901 readers
183 users here now
DROID DOES
Welcome to the droidymcdroidface-iest, Lemmyest (Lemmiest), test, bestest, phoniest, pluckiest, snarkiest, and spiciest Android community on Lemmy (Do not respond)! Here you can participate in amazing discussions and events relating to all things Android.
The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:
Rules
1. All posts must be relevant to Android devices/operating system.
2. Posts cannot be illegal or NSFW material.
3. No spam, self promotion, or upvote farming. Sources engaging in these behavior will be added to the Blacklist.
4. Non-whitelisted bots will be banned.
5. Engage respectfully: Harassment, flamebaiting, bad faith engagement, or agenda posting will result in your posts being removed. Excessive violations will result in temporary or permanent ban, depending on severity.
6. Memes are not allowed to be posts, but are allowed in the comments.
7. Posts from clickbait sources are heavily discouraged. Please de-clickbait titles if it needs to be submitted.
8. Submission statements of any length composed of your own thoughts inside the post text field are mandatory for any microblog posts, and are optional but recommended for article/image/video posts.
Community Resources:
We are Android girls*,
In our Lemmy.world.
The back is plastic,
It's fantastic.
*Well, not just girls: people of all gender identities are welcomed here.
Our Partner Communities:
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Realistically this only forms a tiny part of the population though, that's pretty much the only reason why they've been able to keep people out.
If only a tiny part of people care at all, why even make it sooooo complicated and change every damn update? Let people that WANT control, have control. The others don't care anyway and are scared enough by a "are you REALLY REALLY REALLY sure you know what you're doing here?"-security-question.
I don't pay 1000,- for a phone that isn't mine, and I hate that this has become the default.
On the one hand, I could see bad actors taking advantage of easily rooted/unlocked systems. Maleficent resellers could also take advantage.
Definitely give me the warnings and let me know what could happen, but let me unlock it and own it completely.
That's how it is usually when rooted. A confirmation is shown.
Or let it be set do decline by default and let the user explicitly change this. Problem solved. Of course malign intent wouldn't be benefical with pre-rooted-no-confirmation-phones ๐
I agree with you but to play devil's advocate, even for the simple issue of app sideloading on Android, there's no shortage of dumb users out there that willingly bypass all sorts of warnings and install apps that are very obviously malware.
... And? Does a system have to be adjusted to the lowest denominator?
If you use a thing, of which you have zero clues about, and still fuck around with it, you get what you ask for. People don't understand the slightest thing about the internet and still use it to go to "free" streaming-sites and whatnot.
I don't say rooting-per-default. But an easy option to do so. And also unlocking the bootloader. It's ok if it's hidden. And let it come with 5 security questions รก la "u rly sure?". If someone doesn't know what he's doing, and still does it, and screws up, so be it. Charge the dumbnut in support.
Don't shoot the messenger lol. I'm in agreement with you.
Oh sorry, that wasn't meant to come across harsh ๐