161

His claims are quickly debunked in the article, as the true reason is, obviously, protecting their IP and subscription model

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] falsem@kbin.social 6 points 9 months ago

That sounds an awful lot like even their first party cartridges could be attack vectors.

[-] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 8 points 9 months ago

Yes. I suspect that when they say the printers are only vulnerable via third-party cartridges, they mean that obviously no genuine HP cartridge would contain malicious software, therefore any malicious cartridge is by definition third party, therefore the printers are only vulnerable via third-party cartridges.

this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2024
161 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37702 readers
146 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS