785
submitted 1 year ago by Atemu@lemmy.ml to c/firefox@lemmy.ml

I've been using Consent-O-Matic which works pretty well but built into the browser? Wow.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 year ago

Been using "I still don't care about cookies", but native support would be legendary

[-] Lumidaub@feddit.de 34 points 1 year ago

Wait, I thought that just accepted everything? Because if you don't care about cookies, you'd be fine with anything, no? But "rejecting" cookie banners to me implies rejecting cookies which is different if I'm not mistaken.

[-] cheerjoy@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

That extension is just hiding the banner, same as if you blocked it with ublock cosmetic filtering

[-] Sleepkever@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Not 100% true according to the description on that page. It just hides the banner if possible but it will automatically accept some or even all cookies and tracking if it is required for the site to function. And their choice if they accept some or all depends on "whichever is easier to do".

And functionality of the website could be social media or video embedding which might be "required for the site to function" in the eyes of the extension maintainers. But which will send data to Facebook, Google, and the likes. That could be okay depending on what your stance but a good thing to be aware of.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2023
785 points (98.5% liked)

Firefox

17303 readers
281 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS