419
submitted 9 months ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

We Asked A.I. to Create the Joker. It Generated a Copyrighted Image.::Artists and researchers are exposing copyrighted material hidden within A.I. tools, raising fresh legal questions.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 12 points 9 months ago

When they asked for an Italian video game character it returned something with unmistakable resemblance to Mario with other Nintendo property like Luigi, Toad etc. ... so you don't even have to ask for a "screencapture" directly for it to use things that are clearly based on copyrighted characters.

[-] sir_reginald@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

you're still asking for a character from a video game, which implies copyrighted material. write the same thing in google and take a look at the images. you get what you ask for.

you can't, obviously, use any image of Mario for anything outside fair use, no matter if AI generated or you got it from the internet.

[-] doctorcrimson@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago

But the AI didn't credit the clear inspiration. That's the problem, that is what makes it theft: you need permission to profit off of the works of others.

[-] sir_reginald@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

you need permission to profit off of the works of others.

but that's exactly what I said. you can't grab an image of Mario from google and profit from it as you can't draw a fan art of Mario and profit from it as well as you can't generate an image of Mario and profit from it.

It doesn't matter if you're generating it with software or painting it on canvas, if it contains intellectual property of others, you can't (legally) use it for profit.

however, generating it and posting it as a meme on the internet falls under fair use, just like using original art and making a meme.

[-] doctorcrimson@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

The users are allowed to ask for those things

The AI company should not be allowed to give it in return for monetary gain.

[-] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago

Also ask literally any human and they’ll probably name Mario first. Not just top 10, number 1.

[-] Jilanico@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

If you asked me to draw an Italian video game character, I'd draw Mario too. Why can't an AI make copyrighted character inspired pics as long as they aren't being sold?

[-] doctorcrimson@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

You credited it just now as Mario, a Nintendo property, which the AI failed to do. Plus, if you were paid to draw Mario then you'd have broken laws about IP. Why don't those same rules apply to AI?

[-] cecinestpasunbot@lemmy.ml 0 points 9 months ago

Well that’s exactly the problem. If people use AI generated images for commercial purposes they may accidentally infringe on someone else’s copyright. Since AI models are a black box there isn’t really a good way to avoid this.

[-] doctorcrimson@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago

Sure there is, force the AI to properly credit artists and if they don't have permission to use the character then the prompt fails. Or the AI operators have no legal rights to charge for services and should be sued into the ground.

this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2024
419 points (83.0% liked)

Technology

59148 readers
2264 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS