1000
Hey, maybe poor people don't deserve to starve?
(lemmy.dbzer0.com)
If lemmy.world finds this, please tell my starving children that I love them.
You're not far left enough for me if you're still thinking that instead of "let's go grab the guillotine"
The replies to this are insane. These people are actively harming millions. Its their fault if the world forms a fist aimed at their faces.
That's fine with me, I don't have any interest in "let's just kill a bunch of people" as an ideology. It's objectively wrong.
That's not the ideology though, guillotine memes are essentially just pushing for revolutionary restructuring of the state and economy. Nobody simply thinks "kill rich" and stops thinking there.
That's news to me, I always got the impression that "????" Was the next step after "kill rich"
More accurately, revolutionary restructuring of society is the first step towards a better future.
In this case it would be self-defense. The only reason anyone thinks otherwise is because the danger posed by a billionaire money hoarder is far more abstract than what most people are accustomed to.
The guillotines aren't necessary if the rich would strive for a better society.
The thing is that they would never agree to that, so then we need the guillotine.
The path to a better society is elimination of Capitalism, so Capitalists aren't really going to agree to that, no matter how nice it would make things.
Billionaires aren't people
Believe it or not, they are. Only humans are capable of such cruelty.
This is silly. Billionaires are people, otherwise guillotines wouldn't be effective.
Right, a society of machines would never create something as vile, insidious and wasteful as a billionaire
I don't think people should die but I do think people have a right to steal if that's what will keep them alive. am I not far left enough
I'm actually surprised by people who think others should just die instead of stealing, if that's the choice. Who wouldn't steal?
Guess we won't know since those people are dead.
It appears symbolism isn't a trait you possess.
The important part is to direct the anger towards the real enemy: the leeches sucking our planet dry and planning their escape off world. „Left“ and „Right“ are categories we were told to think in, along with buzzwords like „neoliberal“ and „woke“.
As in the definition of a cult, special language is used to divide us further and cut us off from one another.
Even calling for guillotines is kind of the same thing. We should stop killing each other. Just seize everything they have and leave them fending for themselves, same as every one of us.
The idea that Capitalists are directly controlling the media and intentionally inflammatory to create endless culture war that divides the Proletariat against itself is a firmly leftist belief.
I know. I‘m just trying to get peeps from hating each other because this only helps those in power.
From the downvotes I deduce that not everyone likes the idea.
I mean, it's also objectively true, but "leftist" and "true" align more often than not.
Leftists generally are correct and also morally superior to conservatives, yes. Conservativism is reactionary and opposes liberation, in favor of maintaining current power structures, even if it relies on outward hatred of the less fortunate.
Although it is understandable that you are frustrated with the „others“, I think the „right wing nutjobs“ are not what conservatism actually aspires to be.
If you read up on conservative values, the ideas are partly morally sound:
Those were the only ones I could find that are most probably agreeable. I agree that fascists are evil but if we put everyone in that basket who wants to take care of their homeland we’re no better than them. We should know better.
Or did I not understand you correctly?
In my opinion, the actions of conservative people and politicians are inconsistent with their stated values.
I agree. Thats why I said it. Conservatism isnt the enemy. People are riled up against each other and ultimately themselves.
There's a difference between espoused values and practical plans. Conservatives want strong government, draconian punishment to keep people in line, limited social safety nets, and traditional gender roles and family structure. All of this is built on regressive outlook and results from reactionary outlook.
That is what current „conservative“ politicians in certain countries do. What I‘m saying is that we‘re only hurting ourselves if we hate each other. Instead we must agree on things and keep each other honest imo.
One reason why conservatives turn to right wing nutjobs is because someone (populists) promises them answers they can understand. The evidently more educated side instead looks down on them. Its obvious from the derogatory language some people use.
I‘m saying we wont make this world better by killing each other. The enemy is in control of the media and tries to cut off education (paywall it, dilute it) so we‘re easier to manipulate.
The working class is indeed divided against itself knowingly by Capitalists in power.
…which in turn keeps them in power.
Logical solution = undivide and take back said power.
Correct, which is why the left needs to win over right wingers and convince the right to become left, as the right stands in support of this power structure.
…which will happen right after the sun explodes.
Instead, we could not accept political ideology and instead start cooperating and understanding based on things we can agree on.
If people agreed that the majority of profit produced by labor should benefit labor its not important what other political ideologies they have.
If the majority started striking until profit goes back to those producing it, this all would be over in a month.
But if they wear a shirt each, dividing them into their political camp, they wont cooperate.
Can you see how this is a tool to keep us from taking our fair share?
I understand that your heart is in the right place, but this is woefully naive.
Convincing someone right wing to come to the left is to convince the right wing that the majority of profit should benefit labor. If the right believed that they deserved the products of their labor, they would be left.
Shaking hands with racists, sexists, homophobes, bigots, transphobes, etc. Is regressive and puts minority groups in danger.
The right does not see that they are victims of Capitalists. The left, does. Thus, the left need to bring the right to the left.
People have called me naive since I was very young, often getting enraged when I turned out to be right, which was often the case.
Agreeing on small things is what breaks the dams. You dont need to believe me, just try to live healthier, be more productive, etc. It doesnt work like that. Small changes lead to the big outcomes.
You might be shaking hands with child molesters, murderers and other scum in every group you’re in. That argument is defeatist. You‘d need to scan every person for every detail so you dont have to worry about their ideology being the wrong one.
I‘d say its your opinions that are a little short sighted tbh.
Buddy, right-wing is defined by supporting Capitalism, along with upholding racial, gender, and sexuality hierarchies.
The only way the right would work with the left to liberate themselves from Capitalism, racism, sexism, homophobia, and transphobia, is if the right became left.
You aren't making a profound statement, everyone agrees that the Proletariat should work together. However, in order to do so, the right must learn and become left.
Its the third time you‘re saying the same stuff. I suppose we must agree to disagree here. You go educate the cat to become a dog. I‘ll teach them to behave different. Good luck. :)
People aren't born right wing, that's absurd. You're pretending that supporting Capitalism is genetic.
You aren't teaching people how to behave differently, if you're trying to convince the right that they deserve the value of their own labor, then you're convincing them to be left! There's no such thing as an anticapitalist right winger.
I‘m saying the difference in ideology is more profound. Taking my arguments literally doesnt make you correct. Good bye
You're saying the right wing should join the left in being left wing, but denying that you're doing that.
You cant leave it be, can you? Blocked.
Which definition of a cult is that? Because there is no scientific definition. There are models for high-control organizations (a term used specifically because "cult" has too much baggage for scientific methods), and language is only one aspect of information control. Every single organization on Earth will create its own language for things. That alone doesn't mean they're high-control.
I've been in a high-control organization. It doesn't work like that, and I think diluting the term to cover such broad categories is insulting to people who have been there.
Saying something shares the mechanics of a cult is not insulting to someone who has been in a cult if that is what you mean.
Its a pattern I recognized. People fight over who is right and left, neo-contra-whatever. Its ultimately not informative and makes misunderstandings more common.
And what I‘m actually saying is that the media is controlled by the same people who benefit from us fighting instead of demanding housing prices go down immediately or wages go up accordingly. Its not that hard. We‘re just told its impossible.
This argument is basically the same as those put forward by the right wing nut jobs that think their second amendment rights to tote a rifle will let them fight against the US govt.
Just because a method functioned a couple centuries ago in a far simpler time, does not mean it will function today. Gotta keep up with the times there gramps.
Did it? Friendly reminder to all that the French Revolution was a failure.
Are you operating under the impression that the French Revolution created the current republic? If so, you're missing many, many steps. One of which was a fellow named Napoleon who crowned himself emperor.
I’m… agreeing with you…
Ah, was not sarcasm. My mistake.
Far left in my country would be terrorist organizations from the leftover decades where terrorist groups formed around the Soviet communist idea.