67
submitted 9 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Taylor Swift has shattered virtually every major record in the music industry, and as she lives her best life supporting her boyfriend, Kansas City Chiefs tight end Travis Kelce, she’s also breaking the brains of right-wingers.

For months now, the digital fever swamps have been fuming over everything and anything Swift-related. Her popularity, the success of the Eras Tour, her relationship, her appearances at NFL games, and especially her politics. The Chiefs won the AFC championship on Sunday, punching the team’s (and potentially Swift’s) ticket to the Super Bowl in February. In response, long-standing conspiracy theories around the NFL’s “scriptwriting” for football seasons clashed with right-wing conspiracy theorists claiming Swift’s involvement with Kelce is part of a deep state plot to gin up support for President Joe Biden in the 2024 election. The result is as ugly as it is stupid.

Former presidential candidate and MAGA blowhard Vivek Ramaswamy tweeted on Monday that he wondered “who’s going to win the Super Bowl next month,” adding, “I wonder if there’s a major presidential endorsement coming from an artificially culturally propped-up couple this fall. Just some wild speculation over here, let’s see how it ages over the next 8 months.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] cmbabul@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

It wouldn’t shock me to find out the NFL is setting the cards up to fall how they want, especially now that gambling is a legal part of it, but there is absolutely zero chance that Jerry Jones and the other NFL owners are doing it to get Biden reelected or anything else besides a shit load of money. Which, Taylor Swift at the Super Bowl will certainly help them do even more than they already were going to. It’s always so weird that they never see the simplest explanation that’s always right in front of them, money and therefore power

[-] BakerBagel@midwest.social 0 points 9 months ago

I'm absolutely sick of all the gambling ads, and while it isn't NFL, fucking Manfred has ruined the beauty of classic uniforms like the Cardinals and Yankees by slapping ads in them. I am sick of all these ads and money ruining all my favorite sports.

I stopped eatching the NFL after Kroneke absolutely fucked St. Louis and I think i am about to be completely done with college football with the way things are going there as well. I hate watching capitalism take down everything i love with it

[-] AnarchoSnowPlow@midwest.social 0 points 9 months ago

Ramsfugees are always welcome on the chiefs bandwagon. The overwhelming attitude was always fuck kroenke. I'm not a Missourian anymore but Midwestern rams fans always get a free pass to bandwagon wherever they want imo.

If you're looking for unique ownership, the Packers are probably the best example of that. I've always been jealous of their ownership model.

I mean, obviously, unbridled capitalism is destroying everything because a "constant growth mindset" is just "cancer" with bonus words, but don't let it steal your joy too.

[-] BakerBagel@midwest.social 2 points 9 months ago

I wasn't willing to be a Chiefs fan when i lived in KC during the Matt Cassell years, so i wont bandwagon on now. Baseball will always be my true love, but i am enjoying my local ECHL hockey team in the winter. Go Walleye!

[-] WidowsFavoriteSon@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago

US rugby, my friend. It's the last bastion.

[-] skulblaka@startrek.website 1 points 9 months ago

Until people start watching it. Any significant concentration of eyes will spawn ads.

[-] NightGaunts@kbin.social -2 points 9 months ago

I like how you casually drop a ridiculous conspiracy at the top. Just how exactly would the rigging work? Are all the owners in on it? The players too? The refs? Vendors? What about Kapernick? Is he in on it too? Maybe I am in in it too?

[-] beardown@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago

The officiating has been historically terrible this year. Multiple game deciding calls were missed or wrongly made.

If you want to decide games to ensure that the spread does/doesn't hit then you just need to throw in a few pass interference penalties or holding calls. Aka, the most inconsistently applied and most subjective calls in sports

[-] cmbabul@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Strike zone and the definition of a balk are up there too, but I’ve been watching football at both major levels for 25 years and I still couldn’t tell you what constitutes a hold anymore. There’s always been holding on every play but I’ve seen egregious no calls and phantom calls in key moments at a far higher rate than I remember even as recently as pre pandemic

[-] cmbabul@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Ridiculous to setup a sporting event for gambling purposes? You’re right that’s definitely never happened in major US sports, not like the World Series was ever famously thrown and fighters have never gone down in the 4th round, points shaving definitely isn’t a thing either. This isn’t like the moon landing where thousands of people would have to tell the same lie forever, in football especially all it would take is one or two on field officials and a couple in the booths to make a few questionable calls to severely tilt the game in one direction or the other.

Is the result predetermined before the season or even the playoffs, no that would actually be absurd and nearly impossible to set up, but setting things up so the two most potentially profitable teams win in the championship round and move on isn’t that outlandish an idea.

And I didn’t even make the contention they were in fact rigging it, I said I wouldn’t be shocked if I found out they were. Because NFL teams owners are cutthroat greedy assholes top to bottom unless Bezos’s ex wife bought a team without me knowing

this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2024
67 points (94.7% liked)

politics

19072 readers
3834 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS