244

The Apple Vision Pro is supposed to be the start of a new spatial computing revolution. After several days of testing, it’s clear that it’s the best headset ever made — which is the problem.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] RainfallSonata@lemmy.world 96 points 9 months ago

I very much do not want AR. There will be ads everywhere. What happened to the anger people had toward Google Glass and the feeling that people wearing them would be recording everything around them basically all the time?

[-] Dmian@lemmy.world 52 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

The biggest problem I see from these kind of devices is: you're isolating yourself. For example, it looks very cool that you can see a movie with a similar experience to a theatre, but you're completely isolated using it. I don't see a family, each with one of these devices on, watching a movie on the couch at the same time. It's complicated enough when people have their smartphones out while eating with others...

That doesn't mean that it hasn't its uses, but it's more limited than what the try to sell to you. You're by yourself when you're using this device, even if you can see others.

[-] Deceptichum@kbin.social 44 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Yeah that’s crazy isolating yourself. Now excuse me while I go sit at my desktop ignoring everyone else with my headphones in.

Fun fact, over a hundred years ago people used to complain about others reading the newspaper at breakfast because it was destroying family’s time together. I don’t know how family social dynamics will survive this newspaper craze.

[-] Dmian@lemmy.world 17 points 9 months ago

I’m not claiming that this is the end of western civilization or anything like that. What I mean is: the ads sell it like “you will be able to interact with those around you without problems”, and I think that’s not entirely true.

I’m not judging people wanting to isolate themselves, but in my opinion taking this thing off or putting it on is not as easy as putting your smartphone aside, or a newspaper aside.

My thinking is that this will be way more an individual experience than Apple sells. So people should take that into consideration.

[-] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 0 points 9 months ago

Other people can see what you’re doing, and you can see them just by turning your head.

If newspapers glued themselves to your face you might have a point.

[-] Deceptichum@kbin.social 19 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

And you can take off a visor.

Have you never been so engrossed in an activity that you've tuned out the world around you, only to be shocked when someone taps you on the shoulder to get your attention? These complaints are as worn out as Aristotle moaning about the youths.

[-] nicetriangle@kbin.social 21 points 9 months ago

Yes and no. I’ve used a Quest to watch movies in a theater with different people from around the world and it was a very social experience. I’ve also attended a few support group meetings for dealing with loss in VR and that was honestly a really positive experience.

[-] Dmian@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago

That’s interesting. It’s a bit funny that new technology can take us closer to those far, and at the same time take us far from those close. :P

[-] nicetriangle@kbin.social 7 points 9 months ago

Agreed on that, it's a weird dichotomy. I think in a way the internet as a whole has had that effect on people.

Connections in real life don't feel a deep as I remember them being in the past and its so often you see a group of people out to dinner or drinks together staring at their phones. Meanwhile I have a lot of pretty decent connections online with people I've never met in person or maybe only once or twice.

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

That’s an interesting perspective because I often feel the opposite. Especially post pandemic, I’ve gotten really into going out to bars and just talking to people. I barely even use my phone and sometimes will put it on do not disturb (unless wife calls) even while talking to people I barely know. They’re interesting folks.

But also I do have friends I made on the internet and have been greatly changed by internet interactions. Hell even my ideology was as I grew up on XKCD. But I’ve isolated myself to nothing but the internet before. Once with depression and fear as a queer teenager, and once with depression and fear as a person living through a global pandemic (thank fuck I had my wife for that), and I need quite a bit of face to face communication too or my brain loses its shit. And I need real irl community.

[-] nicetriangle@kbin.social 2 points 9 months ago

Based on the amount of screen time zoomers are reporting (saw some article about it recently and it was insane), I think there's a boatload of people who are glued to devices and not being present.

I'm a good bit older than that and I've definitely been making an effort to get off my phone. I took all the social apps off about 3-4 months ago and it's been a big improvement. Gonna keep finding ways to unplug. I need to stop posting here during the day so much honestly. I'd probably get a lot more work done.

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Yeah I definitely do spend a lot of time on the phone it’s just I also need irl people time.

[-] MeatsOfRage@lemmy.world 29 points 9 months ago

One thing I give Apple credit for is keeping ads out of the primary operating system. I've got an Apple TV and a Google TV (I refuse to use it's full name). Apple TV is just a grid of Apps whereas the Google homescreen immediately hits you with an ad for a show on a streaming service you might not even have. Even the Google remote has dedicated buttons for Netflix and YouTube and I'm not a Netflix subscriber.

I guess it's the difference between Apple being a hardware/software company and Google being an advertising company.

[-] GamingChairModel@lemmy.world 16 points 9 months ago

Apple TV is just a grid of Apps whereas the Google homescreen immediately hits you with an ad for a show on a streaming service you might not even have.

Apple TV+, the streaming service, does show ads for content. It's one of the worst, in my opinion, at pre-roll ads for other shows you didn't click on.

Then, in the interface, you'll get banner-like ads for other stuff, mostly Apple TV+ exclusives. Also, the interface also does push casual browsing (or search) into the paid buy/rent options also.

Apple's days of focusing on user experience above all else has shifted towards getting you to pay for stuff. Just because it mainly steers towards stores they own (app store, music/movies/TV, services subscriptions) doesn't make it any less intrusive of advertising.

[-] MeatsOfRage@lemmy.world 17 points 9 months ago

Apple TV+ is an app though (which I never use). I'm talking about the operating system and the extended area above the apps is only applicable to the apps you put there (all of which for me just show the stuff you're currently watching).

[-] GamingChairModel@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Apple TV+ and Apple Music do have first party status, subtly favored by the operating system itself. The Siri/search integration is tighter with those services than competing services, which is especially important on a TV interface (where there isn't a keyboard or mouse or touchscreen). I think search for music still only looks at the Apple Music catalog and won't search Spotify/YouTube/Tidal.

It's not a glaringly obvious promotion of their own products, but that's what I mean when I say that Apple pushes users towards their own stores. On desktop and mobile, they're pushing Apple's own paid cloud storage (and won't let competing services fulfill the same functionality), at the OS level.

[-] NicoCharrua@lemmy.ca 2 points 9 months ago

There are ads on the app store, which I'd consider to be part of the "primary operating system", especially since it's the only way to install apps.

Not to mention constant ads for icloud. In the photos app, and even notifications from the settings app. (It's possible to turn these off, but not easy or intuitive).

After switching to Android, I haven't seen a single ad in the operating system, (I think Play Store does have ads, I just haven't got any for some reason). The closest thing is Google photos sometimes asking me to turn on backup.

[-] hubobes@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Edit: Ignore my complaint. You learn something new every day.

  1. Open the Settings app from the Apple TV home screen.
  2. Select Remotes and Devices.
  3. Click on TV Button to switch the setting to Home.

Original: Except for the fact that the remote has no home button anymore. It always opens the Apple TV+ app. Otherwise I agree though, ad-free experience, best TV-box I ever owned.

[-] DJDarren@thelemmy.club 8 points 9 months ago

You can change that in the settings. It’s been that way since the remote with the touch pad. It can either go to ATV+ or Home. One of the first things I do with a new ATV is change it.

[-] olympicyes@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

You can also double click the TV button to switch between open apps.

[-] philodendron@lemdro.id 1 points 9 months ago

I’m fairly certain you can remap that Netflix button

[-] MeatsOfRage@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Regardless of the function, Netflix paid to get their name advertised right on the remote.

[-] IHawkMike@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

I'm always reminded of this video when I think about just how bad AR could be. But then again, it could be pretty cool if we can only keep control over our tech.

https://youtu.be/YJg02ivYzSs

[-] magic_lobster_party@kbin.social 4 points 9 months ago

Quick! Hide it before some LinkedIn lunatic use it as some inspirational post about how AR tech will revolutionize our lives.

[-] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 2 points 9 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://piped.video/YJg02ivYzSs

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[-] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 8 points 9 months ago

What happened to the anger people had toward Google Glass and the feeling that people wearing them would be recording everything around them basically all the time?

People feel that way all the time now, so AR glasses no longer seem as intrusive to most people.

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Yeah they realized that if we’re constantly tracked we burn out on it.

[-] ki77erb@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

There will be ads everywhere.

Too late.

[-] PatFussy@lemm.ee 6 points 9 months ago

I don't think these glasses are intended for general public use right now. I know big businesses that want them for manufacturing quality control but outside that what is the point of AR?

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

As an industrial engineer I can think of plenty of uses of it has a halfway decent pathway overlay. Part picking with highlighted parts can be amazing and it could revolutionize assembly.

Outside factories, I’d love a gps hud on my car, and on walks. Not enough to sacrifice the little privacy I have in my own eyes though.

Edit: sorry was thinking AR glasses in general not these specifically. I wouldn’t even let my QC team use these. If the battery connection breaks you’re blind in a manufacturing environment and that’s dangerous

[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

I don't want something that's an electrical failure from me being unable to see strapped over my head while driving.

At least Google Glass was transparent.

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

Oh full agreement there. I think a google glass like tool has a handful of potential applications. This specifically, I’d never put it on someone in a manufacturing environment for the exact same reason you won’t drive with one.

[-] PatFussy@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago

Hololense glasses already provides the uses you are referencing for part picking with their dynamic 365 program suite. I have personally implemented some uses at a few locations.

Outside of sku management or manufacturing, it is a stretch. I don't imagine people using these for every day use. There is little functionality that currently supports any use outside of a workplace.

[-] SPRUNT@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Spoken like someone who lacks vision.

How about going to a foreign country and being able to navigate the streets like a local thanks to the overly guiding you to your destination like Waze? How about being able to read signs and communicate with locals thanks to the instant translation services built in? How about a virtual assistant that can walk you through an oil change specifically for your car? How about a cooking assistant that can warn you if your pot is about to boil over or if you forgot to add the butter? How about taking my shitty dystopian studio apartment and giving me a balcony view of a tropical beach?

There are countless applications for AR ranging from the mundane to the extremely helpful. The tech needs to be developed more before it will be adopted by the masses, but it's far from useless.

By 2030 we'll have AR in a sunglasses form factor with integrated AI that will be able to digitally remove the clothing of everyone you see with a good degree of accuracy for what's underneath.

[-] PatFussy@lemm.ee 8 points 9 months ago

Ok my bad, I wasn't talking about what the technology is 10 years from now. I was just saying in 2024, what technology exists for a general consumer that makes AR worth even talking about.

[-] ComplacentGoat@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 months ago

Those use cases already exist to an extent with current products. I use google translate every day on the jobsite, google maps already provides step by step navigation, youtube videos guide me on car repair, smart sensors with phone and smartwatch alerts for almost anything you can imagine, rollable and thin film transparent displays for walls and windows. Its hard to see AR/VR overtaking existing technologies except for niche use cases. The tech is gonna have to advance well past 2030 projections to be both cheap and feasible for practical use. Batteries will need an order of magnitude higher energy density and microchips will need to pass the teraFLOP barrier while consuming less than a watt of power, all while fitting into a comfortable and unobtrusive form factor suited for long term daily use. I don't see that happening anytime in the next decade honestly.

[-] a1studmuffin@aussie.zone 3 points 9 months ago

Glass arrived on the scene in 2013. Since then recording in public has become much more normalised... smartphone camera use, cars with dashcams and CCTV/face recognition have all increased in popularity. YouTubers, live streamers, creators etc. If it were released again today, I'm not sure it would achieve the same hatred it did back then, at least on the "creepy camera in public" point.

this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2024
244 points (90.9% liked)

Technology

59590 readers
3036 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS