No U.S. threat to Iran will go unanswered, Tehran says (www.reuters.com)

submitted 9 months ago by MarcoPOLO@sh.itjust.works to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml

35 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] ganksy@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago

Why did the US want to strike Iranian targets?

[-] Montagge@kbin.earth 15 points 9 months ago

Iran is the world’s fifth most resource-rich country, with the second largest natural gas reserves and the fourth largest crude oil reserves, and with a total value of resources amounting to $27.3 trillion.

https://arabcenterdc.org/resource/iran-a-resource-rich-country-reeling-from-rampant-poverty/

[-] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world 15 points 9 months ago

"In 1951, Mohammad Mosaddegh was elected Prime Minister of Iran, voted in by the legislature and confirmed by the Shah. Mosaddegh became enormously popular after he nationalized the oil industry of Iran, which had been largely controlled by foreign interests. He worked to weaken the monarchy of Mohammad Reza Pahlavi until Mosaddegh was removed in the 1953 Iranian coup d'état—initially an Anglo-American covert operation that marked the first time the United States had participated in an overthrow of a foreign government during the Cold War"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran#1951–1978:_Mosaddegh,_Mohammad_Reza_Pahlavi

There's a reason Iranians call the US The Great Satan.

[-] freagle@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 9 months ago

To maintain their empire

[-] Telodzrum@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

Because Iran is resposible for the deaths of three US service members in Jordan and the wounding of dozens more.

Hitting Iran in Iran was never a likely scenario, though. The response will almost certainly be to Iran-aligned terrorist and/or militia groups outside of Iranian borders. There's a small chance that it will be to direct Iranian assets outside Iranian borders, but most people in the FA space don't think that this is going to happen, either.