320
submitted 9 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

The GOP candidate had said last week that states could secede if they felt the need to do so.

Nikki Haley, fresh off her Civil War history refresher on this week’s Saturday Night Live, appeared to remember what the Constitution allowed when it comes to state secession: nothing.

Haley again walked back her comments saying states could choose if they wanted to secede from the U.S., telling CNN’s State of the Union on Sunday that she didn’t believe the Constitution afforded them that right. It came days after she told radio host Charlamagne tha God that states like Texas could “make the decisions that their people want to make.”

“According to the Constitution, they can’t,” Haley told CNN. “What I think they have the right to do is have the power to protect themselves and do all that. Texas has talked about that for a long time. The Constitution doesn’t allow for that.”

The GOP presidential candidate then tried to pivot to why Texas would consider such an option, citing Gov. Greg Abbott’s frustration with the Biden administration’s handling of the Southern border and the state’s desire to protect itself.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] jaybone@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago
[-] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 25 points 9 months ago

I really don't want to see the harm that will cause millions of people. Not everyone in Texas is the same.

[-] ProfessorProteus@lemmy.world 16 points 9 months ago

As a trapped Texan, thank you for remembering the good people. It's hard even for myself to shake the "fuck em, let them find out" attitude. Honestly the morbid part of me really wants to see the day-one collapse, much as it would hurt.

But then again we all know for a fact that the Cons will find/fabricate a new bogeyman to blame for their very own actions.

[-] GrundlButter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 9 months ago

Hypothetical, obviously, but how would you feel if we let Texas secede but offered relocation assistance for folks that want to flee the state?

[-] ProfessorProteus@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

I think that would be the least the U.S. could do for its (former?) citizens. Or at the least allow for dual citizenship. But secession is definitely not going to happen so I'm not worried :)

Hypothetically though, yeah it would be a huge relief and I'd emigrate without a second thought.

[-] GrundlButter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 9 months ago

Yeah, it seems very unlikely at this point. I was just interested in your perspective.

Hang in there, hope it ends up getting a bit more sane over the next few years.

[-] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)
[-] ProfessorProteus@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

I'm not actually worried that it would happen, and I agree with all your points; fear-mongering is their bread and butter. But thanks for taking the effort to reassure a stranger!

...would absolutely shit their kecks if everyone else in the union went, “Okay then. Bye, Felicia.”

In a nearby parallel universe I'm simultaneously packing my bags and choking on my laughter from my front-row seat 🤣

[-] jaybone@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

I didn’t mean just Texas either.

And they are causing harm to entire states that didn’t vote Republican or vote for anyone who appointed these Supreme Court justices. Their reps are blocking bills in the legislature. Fuck them.

[-] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

Texas has more people who voted against Republicans than all but 3 states: California, Florida, New York. So all those people you are telling to go starve?

Cut Texas out and inflation again goes up. Beef, Grain, Corn... More people will blame the president for it, and then we will get more Republican voters. Issue continues but the people in Texas no longer have social security, Medicare, Medicaid and the U.S. Navy/Army stepped in to secure the oil fields. Exports/imports likely stopped as punishment and the oil companies will sell to 49 states instead of 1. So the people struggle to get gas. Struggle to get to work.. and without food imported from the rest of the states, they will have food shortages outside of beef flour and corn. Electricity will fail once the people can't get to work, so the Internet is no longer useful.. The United Nations will condemn the actions of the U.S. and strain will be put further on our ties, likely further impacting our imports/exports and causing higher inflation. Texas will need help and where would they get it? They won't accept help from China, but guess who has oil and would want to help them? Russia. The U.S. would be Texas's enemy at that point... So Russia doesn't look half bad to keep the lights on and be able to get to work and pay the bills. Then the U.S. would have to pressure Russia into not helping them... Aka U.S. eventually having to go to war against Texas and forcing them into statehood to ensure no other country has access to the land within the U.S. where missiles can reach everywhere without needing to cross a massive ocean.

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

Not just starve, remember that when secession started in Texas they started murdering people who were against secession. They'll absolutely do it again.

[-] 800XL@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

I could see Mexico declaring war on Texas.

[-] eltrain123@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago

You do recognize that secession won’t be a simple process where they can just leave and we keep going about our business as usual, right?

Texas has a huge effect on the national economy. A ton of commerce, energy production,manufacturing, and transport all goes through the Houston ship channel, Mexican points of entry, and across the state through I-10 and I-35.

Secession would mean almost immediate war between the US and Texas, which would cause not only significant loss of life but instability and inflation to a large number of both sides’ civilian population.

The “let them go” arguement is short sighted and unrealistic. It’s just not going to happen.

[-] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

I don't think it would be much of a war with the US having complete air superiority. Couldn't we just drop leaflets telling people to stand clear and obliterate their grid and wait until it gets really hot or really cold while interdicting any commerce other than food and medicine. Some of those bigger facilities need hardware that isn't easy to come by. They would probably still be in the dark 90 days after they sued for peace.

this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2024
320 points (97.3% liked)

politics

19107 readers
3040 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS