this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2024
-1 points (47.6% liked)

United States | News & Politics

8303 readers
595 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Does this conflict with MMT? Or am I misinterpreting

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It does because MMT states that the government can just issue currency without any consequence. However, we now have plenty of evidence that there are indirect negative consequences associated with this policy.

[–] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So why do I hear so much about MMT if it's so easily disproven? Is it just a baby leftist thing?

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

MMT has basically been the dogma that all western mainstream economists subscribe to. Every time there's an economic crash, which happens roughly once a decade, more currency is issued to keep financial institutions afloat. We're now starting to see the results of this policy manifest themselves all around us.