204
submitted 10 months ago by RandAlThor@lemmy.ca to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 24 points 10 months ago

This means nothing without enforcement. I already know how this'll play out.

[-] AdamEatsAss@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago

I don't understand what you mean? If someone is fired for not taking a call in their off time they would file a complaint/sue (I don't know how the Australian legal system works).

[-] thesystemisdown@lemmy.world 36 points 10 months ago

I doubt not taking the call is what the paperwork would reflect.

[-] Teotwawki@lemmy.ml 8 points 10 months ago

Yeah, here in the US almost every state has "at will" employment, so any protections could really be circumvented by just firing a worker for whatever other reason (or no reason at all) they want. Hopefully labor has it better in the land down under.

[-] Nougat@kbin.social 11 points 10 months ago

In the meantime, the worker still has bills to pay and food to buy, and even a successful complaint or suit would still likely end with the worker either not being employed there going forward, or a very confrontational workplace.

this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2024
204 points (100.0% liked)

World News

32491 readers
670 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS