920
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago

If you're talking about

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fountain_(Duchamp)

that's a seminal work of avant guard art. You are still talking about it 100 years later. It's obviously great art.

Art is a work of visual, auditory, or written media that makes you feel emotion. That's it. Does this pile of rocks make you feel happy or sad or anything? Then it's art.

AI makes pictures like a camera does. It doesn't make it art unless you make something that evokes emotion.

[-] sxan@midwest.social 1 points 9 months ago

We're saying the same thing. AI can create art. My point was that we used to claim that art was a domain that was unassailable by machines, and this obviously is not true. So now, humans - or the particular human to whom I was replying - had a new goalpost: adaptabiility.

We'll keep coming up with new goalposts where "humans have an edge" that will keep us relevant and ascendant over machines, and irreplaceable. I believe we'll run out of goalposts faster than many people would like.

You know, there is one small other hope I have: that, despite how we've raised them, our children will be better than us, and will stop the cycle of wealth concentration. It's unlikely, but it's the only chance I see.

this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2024
920 points (94.7% liked)

Programmer Humor

32495 readers
462 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS