106
submitted 9 months ago by tree@lemmy.zip to c/usa@lemmy.ml

In 2021, when China banned bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies, crypto miners flocked to the United States in search of cheap electricity and looser regulations. In a few short years, the U.S.’s share of global crypto mining operations grew from 3.5 percent to 38 percent, forming the world’s largest crypto mining industry.

The impacts of this shift have not gone unnoticed. From New York to Kentucky to Texas, crypto mining warehouses have vastly increased local electricity demand to power their 24/7 computing operations. Their power use has stressed local grids, raised electricity bills for nearby residents, and kept once-defunct fossil fuel plants running. Yet to date, no one knows exactly how much electricity the U.S. crypto mining industry uses.

That’s about to change as federal officials launch the first comprehensive effort to collect data on cryptocurrency mining’s energy use. This week, the U.S. Energy Information Administration, an energy statistics arm of the federal Department of Energy, is requiring 82 commercial crypto miners to report how much energy they’re consuming. It’s the first survey in a new program aiming to shed light on an opaque industry by leveraging the agency’s unique authority to mandate energy use disclosure from large companies.

“This is nonpartisan data that’s collected from the miners themselves that no one else has,” said Mandy DeRoche, deputy managing attorney in the clean energy program at the environmental law nonprofit Earthjustice. “Understanding this data is the first step to understanding what we can do next.”

read more: https://truthout.org/articles/crypto-mining-may-use-more-electricity-than-the-entire-state-of-washington/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] delirious_owl@discuss.online 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

What? Crypto currencies proved their worth Long before speculators joined the scene

Unfortunately, theres no way to keep speculators out

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 months ago

Maybe on the theoretical level, but cryptocurrencies just aren't practical. For example:

  • high fees
  • long transaction time
  • high fluctuation in value

These make it impractical as a replacement for other currencies in most cases. Yes, there's a use case for those who cannot use traditional currencies for whatever reason (e.g. political refugees), but not for the everyday person.

So until it actually solves problems the average person has, it's going to stay in the realm of speculation.

this post was submitted on 09 Feb 2024
106 points (92.1% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7205 readers
297 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS