394
submitted 9 months ago by Wilshire@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Skua@kbin.social 64 points 9 months ago

Every single military in the world will be watching the usage of all sorts of drones in this conflict. Even if you're America or China you need to learn how to defeat them cost-effectively

[-] Jaytreeman@kbin.social 38 points 9 months ago

The US just cancelled a major helicopter project because drones do the job cheaper

[-] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 14 points 9 months ago

Dunno why you were downvoted, you're absolutely correct and I linked to it up above before I saw your comment.

[-] Jaytreeman@kbin.social 6 points 9 months ago

I'm pretty opinionated, and some of them aren't popular. I'm fairly certain I get a few accounts down voting everything I put out there.
Good news, is that I see evidence from other instances, but not a lot on my home.

[-] Shard@lemmy.world 29 points 9 months ago

Drones are becoming a huge game changer.

Even simple unarmed $300 drones with an IR camera are proving to be extremely effective. The level of live battlefield information and situational awareness they are bringing to commanders on the ground is at least equivalent to what a platoon of recon troops can offer.

Next up are the drones capable of carrying light loads like air dropped grenades or explosives than can take our expensive vehicles like aircraft. The return on investment for these systems are insane.

[-] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 20 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Drones are becoming a huge game changer.

The US Army literally just cancelled its FARA Helicopter program because of drones.

"“We are learning from the battlefield – especially Ukraine – that aerial reconnaissance has fundamentally changed,” Army Chief of Staff General Randy George said in a press release."

[-] Shard@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

The US does not like attack helis or something. The Comanche was a cool looking heli that was cancelled back in the day.

To this day we're still operating Apaches, a design first built in 1975.

[-] guacupado@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

Because we don't need multiple versions of helicopters to do the same thing. Most of our recent Apache use is against people using AKs and RPGs then running into caves - ironically enough, probably the same level as its main use-case in 1975.

[-] Pringles@lemm.ee 6 points 9 months ago

But attack helis just seem so fragile. They're relatively easy targets and don't add all that much extra. Transport heli's are way more useful. Hell, even in civilization games heli's are weak.

[-] Tja@programming.dev 3 points 9 months ago

Well, 8 movement points ignoring terrain allow for a lot of pillaging...

[-] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Should send the money saved to Ukraine, money better spent on them in the end, it saved them from spending more money on that instead.

[-] skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 9 months ago

For few hundred $ you get capability that formerly was only provided by ATGMs, and it's several times lighter as well, not to mention increased situational awareness. Every military worth their salt will have to study it and countermeasures

[-] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 11 points 9 months ago
[-] Deceptichum@kbin.social 6 points 9 months ago

This is outrageous! It’s unfair!

[-] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

The drone wars have begun

If any one single sentence ever needed to be Yodafied, it would be this one.

[-] skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 9 months ago

for comparison Stugna-P costs $20k per missile, entire system is 100kg but in return it gets to target much faster and has enough penetration to drill through frontal armour of most tanks, basically guaranteeing mission kill in single hit. drones get to the target in minutes, not seconds and have to find weak spots, but greater maneuverability allows for this

[-] The_v@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

I think drones overwhelming advantage is the range and terrain they are effective in. The ability to find and destroy a target that is moving behind cover is a huge advantage.

How many videos have we seen of assaults moving up behind a tree line for cover. Artillery can stop these but hitting a moving target from miles away takes a lot of shells. Air support can take them out but they are vulnerable on today's battlefield. Weapons like the Stugna-P require line-of-sight on the ground so they have to let them get closer.

[-] skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 9 months ago

Artillery can get quite effective if you have something like BONUS or Smart155 that will find and kill vehicles for you

[-] Deceptichum@kbin.social 3 points 9 months ago

Especially considering war is always a battle between offence and defence and we’ve been in a defence stage for so long with modern armoured vehicles.

[-] Chocrates@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

For sure, hasnt the whole world learned that heavy expensive vehicles can be countered by relatively cheap munitions?
Even without air superiority Ukraine has made MBT's basically useless.

[-] Skua@kbin.social 3 points 9 months ago

To be fair, the fact that so many MBTs are still being lost suggests that they are still useful enough to be used. However, some militaries have been trialled lasers as a sort of lightweight CIWS to protect such vehicles from the likes of incoming missiles, and while that's expensive to add on in the first place the cost per shot is virtually nothing. Turkiye has supposedly already tried one out in live combat, and against UAVs no less

this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2024
394 points (99.0% liked)

World News

39023 readers
2319 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS