276
unusable mouse (lemmy.ml)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 35 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Why should I buy two devices to do the same job, where a single device from any other sane manufacturer would function 100% of the time? Especially after paying a premium for the branded device?

Pay more to get problems others don't have, then pay even more on top to solve those problems...

[-] Hildegarde@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

You don't become a trillion dollar company by selling people things they need. The strategy is to induce demand.

Apple designs products so that when broken it requires a repair that costs 50-75% the cost of the device if repaired by Apple. If you're paying that much to fix it you might as well just buy a new one.

The apple vision pro is glued together, the outer shell and internal lenses have highly scratchable plastic on the outside. Want to fix it, over a thousand. They can't just remove some screws replace the broken part. This is a deliberate design decision.

It's not about making good products, it's about money. If you decide buy a trackpad for when your mouse is charging, apple make bank.

[-] Jax@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 months ago

I would love for an evironmental protection agency to hold corporations accountable for designed obsolescence.

[-] Hildegarde@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

do you even regulatory capture, bro?

this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2024
276 points (88.1% liked)

Funny

6785 readers
457 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS