149

PySimpleGUI is now closed-source (github.com)

submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by ebits21@lemmy.ca to c/python@programming.dev

78 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Previously LGPL, now re-licensed as closed-source/commercial. Previous code taken down.

Commercial users pay $99/year, free for personal use but each user has to make a free account after a trial period.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] taaz@biglemmowski.win 18 points 9 months ago

Whether you are a Hobbyist User or Commercial User, you can start using PySimpleGUI at no cost. To get started with a 30-day trial period, first install Python and then

python -m pip install pysimplegui

...

You can try PySimpleGUI for 30 days, after which you will need to Sign Up. Hobbyist users sign up at no cost, and Commercial Users subscribe at $99/year. For more details, see PySimpleGUI.com/pricing.

How is this trial enforced?

[-] peak_dunning_krueger@feddit.de 18 points 9 months ago

How is this trial enforced?

Since it's now closed source and they distribute what is possibly/probably/presumably a binary blob, the same way all the others are enforced. With some kind of DRM date checking whatever.

[-] XTL@sopuli.xyz 11 points 9 months ago

Does pip really allow binary blobs? That effectively makes it zero security.

[-] etrotta@programming.dev 7 points 9 months ago

To be fair it has some valid use cases, take ruff for example.

But pip/pypi does not have any proper security at all, and just blocking binary blobs wouldn't make a difference when you can freely execute any python code during installation - Much like downloading an executable from any site online, you are expected to make sure you can trust whoever uploaded what you are downloading. You could say the same about other sites like GitHub too.

[-] XTL@sopuli.xyz 6 points 9 months ago

There is a fair difference still between source available and binary blob. The blob has essentially no chance of ever being audited.

[-] elguaxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 9 months ago

Take a look at the Source Distribution files: https://pypi.org/project/PySimpleGUI/#files

As far as I can see, it's still all just Python.

[-] MinekPo1@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 9 months ago

binary blobs aren't really a security hole , since AFAIK the pypi team don't check every package for malicious code before they get shown publicly . it just shifts the trust from pypi to the library authors

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 months ago

Sure, and it's really nice for big compiled projects to not have to compile that on every update.

[-] csm10495@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

They injected some binary code to make a code object (and in doing so inject some obfuscation).. if someone wants to violate the new license, they can easily work around it via installing through pip, commenting out that license check... Not that I endorse library license violations.

I put up packages on pypi with the last LGPL code versions for my own usage. I don't plan on updating them much, but they work for me.

PySimpleGUI-4-foss And psgtray-foss.