543

Brazil’s Lula compares Israel’s war on Gaza with the Holocaust (www.aljazeera.com)

submitted 8 months ago by CollisionResistance@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

101 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] ikidd@lemmy.world 24 points 8 months ago

Well, we could probably take the 15000 or so children off the number, I would guess.

[+] mellowheat@suppo.fi -33 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Perhaps you cannot. Amnesty International thinks Hamas uses children as soldiers: https://www.amnesty.org/en/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/mde150352004en.pdf

Given their religion (dying in holy war is considered a net positive for the individual) and demographics (half of the people are underage), it makes sense if they did.

[-] INHALE_VEGETABLES@aussie.zone 14 points 8 months ago

What a leap of faith #justaskingquestions guesture towards a conclusion during a time where there is really no way to know.

Curb your bias.

[-] admin@lemmy.mohammadodeh.com 14 points 8 months ago

Given their religion

Definitely not an argument against a specific point, but a generalization against an entire population. Pretty much ad hominem on a large scale.

What a bigot with no actual argument. Begone now and thank you 😘

Bye

[+] mellowheat@suppo.fi -12 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I offered an actual argument with actual data from an impartial source. You seem to have twisted my words in the second paragraph that were directed at Islamist terrorists to encompass a whole population.

Being angry at me for saying this does not help. Be angry at them who cynically employ these strategies. If you are a muslim yourself, you're at a much better position to make a positive change than I, being a western atheist, am.

Bye

Are you yogthos?

[-] admin@lemmy.mohammadodeh.com 6 points 8 months ago

Offering your opinion as an “actual argument with actual data” and a link to amnesty international does NOT constitute a coherent, well formed argument.

Reporting me with “uncivil comment” only shows your evasiveness to real discourse and that you will try to silence and put down anyone that disagrees with because you have no real argument to offer.

Good luck in the real world buddy, you’ll need it.

[-] mellowheat@suppo.fi -3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Offering your opinion as an “actual argument with actual data” and a link to amnesty international does NOT constitute a coherent, well formed argument.

Give me your definition of a well-formed argument, then. I also haven't seen your argument based on data, just badmouthing me.

Uncivility is the reason I report things, not bad opinions or arguments. The latter is acceptable because correcting those that's the only way people can learn. Uncivility is unacceptable, since that only causes harm. If you don't see how you were uncivil, I suggest you go read your comment more carefully.

For instance

Good luck in the real world buddy, you’ll need it.

Uncivil. Do you see it now? Thanks to federation, you can imagine your own rules in your own server obviously, but it doesn't remove the fact of how you're behaving.

I would also call out how unclassy it is to make rude comments on regular threads with an "admin" account, but that's another one of your freedoms of running your own instance. But if you keep doing that, at some point other admins will start blocking your instance.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago

I don't think you can use a PDF from 2004 as evidence of anything Hamas is doing currently. They weren't even voted in to power until 2007.

this post was submitted on 18 Feb 2024

543 points (95.0% liked)

World News

39004 readers

2622 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.