It means that if a Christian asks you to design a website with messages that violate your religious beliefs then you can refuse. If I as a satanist believe that a woman's right to abortion is sacred then I can refuse to design a website with an anti-abortion message. I can't simply refuse to design a website for a Christian. Not saying I agree with the ruling, just explaining what it means.

[–] FlowVoid@midwest.social 1 points 2 years ago

The ruling says you don't have to design a website that violates any sincerely held beliefs, not just religious beliefs.

So if you are gay and a Catholic asked you to design a website promoting "Marriage is for one man and one woman", you can refuse. Before the ruling, you might have been found to be discriminating against Catholics.

[–] SpaceToast@mander.xyz -2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Curious, why don’t you agree with the ruling?

[–] Bumblefumble@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Because it's a shit ruling that says discriminating against people is a form of speech. At least that's why I think it's a horrible ruling.

[–] SpaceToast@mander.xyz -1 points 2 years ago

That’s not what it says.