this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2024
19 points (57.9% liked)

World News

37177 readers
674 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] FluffyPotato@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ah yes a quora post that reads like a conspiracy theory with sources that point to other quora posts. This is why debunking qanon, flat earth and other such conspiracies is such a chore, no one ever has like one credible thing to point to, it's a spiderweb of events that usually don't properly connect but they all have massive documents that try to connect them anyways.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How to say you have poor reading comprehension without saying you have poor reading comprehension.

[–] FluffyPotato@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's true: A really high IQ is required to fully comprehend conspiracy posts

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I love how you keep referring to well documented facts as conspiracy theories. Really helps highlight the quality of your intellect.

[–] FluffyPotato@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There are plenty of well documented facts that seemingly support flat earth too and there are hundreds of similar schizo posts with those as that quara post but that doesn't make the earth flat.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago

the blueAnon has spoken 😂

[–] xor@lemmy.blahaj.zone -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ooh quora, well known for it's sane and well researched investigative reporting lmao

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The article literally links to dozens of mainstream western sources. I love how libs are invariably unable to actually engage with the content, and simply resort to ad hominem when faced with facts that run contrary to their narrative.

[–] xor@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

"Quora is not a good source" is not an ad hominem.

libs are invariably unable to actually engage with the content

This, however, is exactly that

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

Dismissing the source because it's Quora without actually engaging with the content of the source which links to lots of primary sources, is in fact an example of ad hominem.

Pointing out that libs use this tactic however is not.