158
submitted 8 months ago by spaduf@slrpnk.net to c/mensliberation@lemmy.ca
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Deceptichum@kbin.social 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

No. The left has a very clear political meaning, it does not simply mean “Whats less to the right”.

When leftists talk about leftist policies as solutions to issues, we dont mean “oh right wing policies but just not super right”.

Left —————| Middle |—A——B— Right

Tell me, what side of that spectrum do you think A is?

[-] Ross_audio@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

I'm afraid "the left" hasn't had a clear meaning for many decades now.

The meaning of what is left and right shifts over time and whatever method you choose to place the middle is where biases appear.

If no party to the left of A has a chance of government and no party to the left of B has a chance of government, you've placed "middle" in the wrong place.

Ignoring political reality by starting a history lesson isn't going to create changes.

It's likely to lead to voters involuntarily disenfranchising themselves and not having any effect on the duopoly the system encourages.

[-] Deceptichum@kbin.social 0 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

The left is not relative, nor has the meaning shifted in all this time.

The left is the same communists and anarchists it has been for over a hundred years world wide now.

Political party popularity does not change political ideological meaning.

And the American system doesn’t encourage duopoly, it literally enforces it. So yes, of course many leftists are going to feel disenfranchised after close to a century of being villainised and neglected by their “representatives”. The solution to that is for a party to adopt leftist ideals, but that goes against the interests of the ruling class who’s money and influence runs the game.

[-] Ross_audio@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

The left is relative. Otherwise we still believe in the solutions of 50 years ago now.

Try nationalising manufacturing and farms. See how well that works. That was left wing once. Now it's not. Even if there are still things you would nationalise.

You're trying to create absolutes to argue easily against. That's often the way political discourse goes but it's wrong.

By all means build a straw man and totem of the left and right but it's far more interesting to find the nuance and use your intelligence rather than treating the debate like a team sport to be won and lost.

[-] Deceptichum@kbin.social 0 points 8 months ago

We do still believe in those solutions?

[-] Ross_audio@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Some do. Plenty on the left don't because studies and examples since have shown where public ownership falls flat on its face and where it's the only efficient way of doing things. As well as the grey area in between.

[-] Deceptichum@kbin.social 0 points 8 months ago

No, no leftist is for privatized ownership of the means of production.

Even market socialists, an extremely niche group barely even worth mentioning still advocate for it public ownership of most things.

[-] Ross_audio@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Simply wrong.

Most people on the left are advocating for evidence based policies and experts in the decision making process.

Not guessing games based on ideology.

this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2024
158 points (85.9% liked)

Men's Liberation

1844 readers
3 users here now

This community is first and foremost a feminist community for men and masc people, but it is also a place to talk about men’s issues with a particular focus on intersectionality.


Rules

Everybody is welcome, but this is primarily a space for men and masc people


Non-masculine perspectives are incredibly important in making sure that the lived experiences of others are present in discussions on masculinity, but please remember that this is a space to discuss issues pertaining to men and masc individuals. Be kind, open-minded, and take care that you aren't talking over men expressing their own lived experiences.



Be productive


Be proactive in forming a productive discussion. Constructive criticism of our community is fine, but if you mainly criticize feminism or other people's efforts to solve gender issues, your post/comment will be removed.

Keep the following guidelines in mind when posting:

  • Build upon the OP
  • Discuss concepts rather than semantics
  • No low effort comments
  • No personal attacks


Assume good faith


Do not call other submitters' personal experiences into question.



No bigotry


Slurs, hate speech, and negative stereotyping towards marginalized groups will not be tolerated.



No brigading


Do not participate if you have been linked to this discussion from elsewhere. Similarly, links to elsewhere on the threadiverse must promote constructive discussion of men’s issues.



Recommended Reading

Related Communities

!feminism@beehaw.org
!askmen@lemmy.world
!mensmentalhealth@lemmy.world


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS