36
Yuan exceeds dollar in China's bilateral trade for first time
(asia.nikkei.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2023
36 points (75.0% liked)
World News
32321 readers
743 users here now
News from around the world!
Rules:
-
Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc
-
No NSFW content
-
No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
Yogthos, I hope you are getting paid for this. Posting propaganda all day, everyday must be tiring.
They love them some state capitalism.
I mean, it's an article from a Japanese source, but yeah sure the OP is biased or whatever, but so is everyone else who regurgitates the top headline from the NYT or BBC. Since the others are part of the dominant ideology, it appears to be more transparent.
They're on the same side.
That sounds overly reductive to me
Maybe the postings are a distress signal? Workers of the world should be set free.
I'm not disagreeing with you, but I don't think pro-chinese, pro-russian or anti-western propaganda is helping.
Me neither, hence the joke
(Maybe each first letter reads "held gunpoint at propaganda factory, send help")
How is anti Western something bad? They are the ones who have been bullying the rest of the world for the past 200 years and continue to want to do so, not to take it to xenophobic levels but anti ststus quo is necessary if you want a multi polar world.
It's always the dream of the petty bourgeoisie to live in a world where they don't have to fear being ousted and expropriated by the big bourgeoisie. That's what the dream of the "multi polar world" is. This is a sham though as capital naturally concentrates- even if the current winner fell, there would be a winner taking its place anew. Even if "the West" fell the problems for the working class would not be over as there would be new powers rising to exploit them in largely the same way.
The real solution is an international one, against all capital big and small, against war, and the linking of labor movements across borders.
I think this could fall into what Mao called "leftist" adventurism, and I do believe that in the context of international and national levels there are situations where the national bourgeoisie takes a revolutionary role, such as it is the case of, for example, Bolivia or Venezuela, where the lack of a scientific Marxist socialism leads to, in some form or another, the national bourgeoisie to be in the power. Still, in the geopolitical game, they play a revolutionary role as the material conditions are not set for a true people's movement due to the West interventionist policies (coups and installments of fascists regimes in Latin America, and so on). I am not saying that in this way they would be liberated from the exploitation, but it would be one dialectical step further into true emancipation from the ruling classes.
Its not anti-Western its anti- extreme capitalism. Why cant we even discuss it? Is there a spectre over the shoulder of capitalism? Something to hide?