96
Target doubles bonuses for salaried employees as profits surge
(www.nbcnews.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2024
96 points (97.1% liked)
Business
422 readers
16 users here now
A place to share business news and insights.
Rules
- Follow lemmy.world rules
- Only post content related to business
- Do not use this community to promote your business
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Sometimes, when the right thing needs to be done, and you are someone who is capable of doing it, you should do it.
It's not her responsibility to cut her own pay to pay her team. I get your sentiment but your solution feels a little misguided. Target is more than capable of compensating everyone if they're making record profits but they choose not to.
Starting salary for my wife's position is $55-60k and she's one level below store directors that make $100k+. Again, she works 50+ hours not by choice, that's the minimum set by the company. She's not the enemy, Target is.
Not a cut.
That's on the company to provide bonuses, not on other employees. It's easy to blame other employees. What's more difficult is to work together and improve things for everyone. So if someone gets a raise or a bonus, don't try to entitle yourself to that money. Try to ensure everyone gets a bonus or raise.
I didn't blame anyone, and I'm not on the side of this equation you assume I am.
Bonuses are tied into compensation. With your logic anyone making more than entry level employees should redistribute their paychecks, which doesn't help anything.
Again, I want to separate C-suite bonuses vs front line manager bonuses. If you're not an executive your bonus is part of your compensation and nowadays is a way for a corporation to withhold pay if performance KPIs aren't hit or the company doesn't do well. It's not "extra pay", it's a contingent part of your salary.
Dude. You're crossing Wheaton's law here.
So why haven’t you given all of your possessions to those who have less?