652
Rule (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 36 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Wait... I'm sorry I have to respond again because this really just hit me. Did you really use GERMANY as an example of why you SHOULD NOT stand up to facisim with violence? GERMANY???

How did letting the facisim play out for ya there champ?

[-] tux0r@feddit.de 5 points 7 months ago

The street fights in 1932 did not do much to prevent fascism, to say the least.

[-] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 25 points 7 months ago

Sounds like they should have tried harder.

[-] skulbuny@sh.itjust.works 5 points 7 months ago

Sounds like they should've had guns

[-] tux0r@feddit.de 4 points 7 months ago
[-] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 16 points 7 months ago

Yet here you are saying if you stand up to fascism with violence you're being authoritative.

[-] tux0r@feddit.de 2 points 7 months ago

Because my country has seen what happens when political disagreements are fought out in months of street battles.

[-] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 20 points 7 months ago

And the world has seen what happens because you gave up on those fights.

[-] FfaerieOxide@kbin.social 6 points 7 months ago

The street fights in 1932 did not do much to prevent fascism, to say the least.

Yes they did.

[-] tux0r@feddit.de 1 points 7 months ago

1933 would like to ask a question or two about that.

[-] FfaerieOxide@kbin.social 1 points 7 months ago

Are you falsely claiming if those mean ol' KDP hadn't punched Hans over there in the face the Nazis wouldn't have burned the Reichstag?

Because taken to end you would seem to be arguing for more violence, and 1945 has some followup questions for you.

this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2024
652 points (100.0% liked)

196

16487 readers
1490 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS