455

rule (lemmy.ml)

submitted 7 months ago by 0x2d@lemmy.ml to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone

47 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] A_Very_Big_Fan@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago

Can we also address that they wrote "is" instead of "are", implying they originally wrote "it" and then erased it?

[-] randint@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 16 points 7 months ago

Are you not supposed to use "is" with "he/she/they"?

[-] A_Very_Big_Fan@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I was high af when I wrote that, I honestly have no clue how I came to that conclusion lol

Edit: actually I think what I was thinking was it doesn't work with "they"

[-] Makeshift@sh.itjust.works 3 points 7 months ago

It doesn’t but at this point it should.

It’s weird and confusing to pluralize a sentence when you’re still talking about a singular individual. We should normalize “Why is they so cute?” If we refuse to make a new non-demeaning word for a singular.

I say non-demeaning because “Why is it so cute?” Is correct, but calling a living being “it” is objectifying.

[-] randint@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I used to think that too, until I realized that verb conjugation in English is not decided by whether the subject is singular or plural. "You" can be both singular or plural, yet we always say "you are" and never "you is". Same for the pronoun "they". It's always "they are".

Unless you is also willing to normalize "you is", I think "they are" is good enough.