334
submitted 7 months ago by deadsuperhero@lemmy.ml to c/fediverse@lemmy.ml

Server indexes of places for newcomers to join can be instrumental for Fediverse adoption. However, sudden rule changes can leave some admins feeling pressure to change policies in order to remain listed.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago

It's a comparison. By definition they're not the same thing but there are similarities; you're doing something that affects 100% of the userbase because you have an issue with 2% of them.

[-] Vendetta9076@sh.itjust.works 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

You should think of a better comparison cause this one sucks.

Also no. You're doing something that affects 100% of users because the node these users use is malicious. The problem is the underlying structure not the people using said structure. Maybe this makes them stop using said structure.

Its like being upset that I dont answer unknown numbers. "Well only 10% are scammers so you're affecting 100% of calls"

[-] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca -1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

This is like comparing requiring students in schools to wash their hands to genocide. The scale is the same but the impact is vastly different, and if you don't want to wash hands (or be defederated) you can just move. Except for changing activitypub instances is even easier than changing schools and both are easier than leaving Palestine.

this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2024
334 points (96.1% liked)

Fediverse

17770 readers
1 users here now

A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.

Fediverse is a portmanteau of "federation" and "universe".

Getting started on Fediverse;

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS