413

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/17617609

They supposedly can be disabled in settings- but we all know that won't last. They're going full Microsoft Skype mode and it's only a matter of time.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] northendtrooper@lemmy.ca 29 points 8 months ago

slowly moving myself to https://revolt.chat/.

Its sad since I've been with discord since almost '15.

[-] jarfil@beehaw.org 27 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Compared to Matrix, or any E2EE chat, this doesn't sound good:

we take your privacy very seriously. And with end-to-end encryption coming to DMs and group chats soon

Compared to Discord, or other established voice chat systems like Mumble, this doesn't sound great either:

We are currently rebuilding the client and the voice server from scratch. The old voice should work in most cases, but it may inexplicably not connect in some scenarios and / or exhibit weird behaviour.

The "app" on Android seems to be just the webapp running in a standalone window.

I'll concede them the OpenSource and self-hosted factors, and it does look like Discord, but it doesn't seem like a suitable replacement for average users... yet. Then again, the ads might push them over.

Guess it's worth to keep an eye on it.

[-] politicalcustard@beehaw.org 15 points 8 months ago

Oh, this looks great. Honestly, I am very happy when closed-source apps become worse, these are all just opportunities for open source to move in and take over.

[-] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

so this Revolt project is open source, which is nice, but still seems to rely on centralized servers. Does it use P2P for voice+video+fileshare so that the original devs aren't on the hook for insane bandwidth requirements? I can't see anything about their networking systems in the FAQ or info pages.

I may consider getting my friends to switch sooner or later if it's more P2P based. But I don't really want something that runs ALL traffic through central servers, because the bandwidth costs will inevitably just lead to the same situation that Discord is now in.

[-] jarfil@beehaw.org 7 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

It's self-hostable, and they seem to be switching to webrtc-rs, not sure whether with P2P or not:

https://trello.com/c/Ay6KdiOV/1-voice-overhaul-and-video-calling

In 2022, they claimed it was using minimal resources on the server:

https://developers.revolt.chat/faq/monetisation

They also don't seem to consider federation as a priority, but then again neither does Discord.

https://developers.revolt.chat/faq/federation

[-] krash@lemmy.ml 9 points 8 months ago

What made you choose revolt chat over matrix? Just curious.

[-] Segab@beehaw.org 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Oh cool there's an Android app, that's gonna make it so much easier to recommend!

Edit: I just read about how it's centralized and not encrypted, I'm not sure how this can become anything but Discord except open source and less popular. Matrix + Element seems to cover my use case for a project a bit better, I'll give that a try.

[-] jarfil@beehaw.org 5 points 8 months ago

Just tried it... it says "Running in Chrome". Seems to be a repackaged webapp.

[-] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

well that's no different than Discord already, so net zero change

running webapps in chrome or Electron containers simplifies a lot of development, i don't like their resource requirements or dependency on Chromium, but I do understand needing to streamline development so devs can work on more important backend stuff.

[-] jarfil@beehaw.org 9 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

The difference is:

  • Discord: Electron app, 156 MB, works offline
  • Revolt: webapp, 635 kB, doesn't work offline

The "works offline" is not much of a bonus for a chat app, but you can access cached chats on Discord, while Revolt... just doesn't run.

There seem to be other clients for it, though. Haven't checked those out.

[-] SteveTech@programming.dev 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

In theory PWAs can be configured to run offline, whether they're doing that I don't know.

The desktop app looks like it's electron though.

[-] jarfil@beehaw.org 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I know, one of the best PWAs I've seen is Draw.io, fully usable offline, with both device and browser storage.

The Revolt's one however, even though delivered as a PWA, seems to be only the login page. If already logged in, it throws a "Network error." dialog. Haven't checked the desktop one.

this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2024
413 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37782 readers
271 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS