151
submitted 5 months ago by hal_5700X@sh.itjust.works to c/firefox@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] LWD@lemm.ee 11 points 5 months ago

Reading through the current Qwant privacy policy certainly doesn't alleviate any privacy concerns either....

Mozilla keeps building/buying, then abandoning things. I'm not sure if they're cut out for that project, and in my experience a SearX instance's effectiveness is mostly based on whether there are enough users for the data to be obfuscated, but so few that it doesn't get rate limited...

[-] Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 months ago

Certainly some things are rate limited, Brave and Startpage are particularly bad for this. I omit them from my endjinns in Searx settings.

[-] LWD@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago

If you can use Google through SearX, isn't Startpage redundant? IIRC they don't ever claim to do anything but proxy Google results.

[-] Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 months ago

Yes, except in the case where Google is rate limited. There is/was a Searx instance that regularly got blocked by Google, I do not remember which one though.

[-] Kindness@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 months ago

isn’t Startpage redundant?

After they were purchased by an advertising company? Yes.

this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2024
151 points (96.3% liked)

Firefox

17303 readers
431 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS