53
submitted 7 months ago by alyaza@beehaw.org to c/environment@beehaw.org

these of course come with their own tradeoffs, but you take what you can get

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] eveninghere@beehaw.org 12 points 7 months ago

But how much of that is simply shifted outside? Manufacturing batteries, generating electricity etc.

[-] epyon22@programming.dev 23 points 7 months ago

Even in areas that use coal you use less overall emissions within the lifetime of the vehicle

https://youtu.be/6RhtiPefVzM?si=l7nepxiZqoWhZrpU

[-] eveninghere@beehaw.org 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

No, my question was, how much of the 2-3% yearly reduction within Bay Area is just shifting the emission to elsewhere?

[-] sqgl@beehaw.org 3 points 7 months ago

Yeah if we factor in the source of the power we might be looking at a not-so-exciting statistic.

However it does put us into position to take advantage of the inevitable greening of the grid. It would be foolish to wait until it is completely greened before beginning the transition to EV's.

load more comments (4 replies)
this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2024
53 points (100.0% liked)

Environment

3921 readers
25 users here now

Environmental and ecological discussion, particularly of things like weather and other natural phenomena (especially if they're not breaking news).

See also our Nature and Gardening community for discussion centered around things like hiking, animals in their natural habitat, and gardening (urban or rural).


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS