9
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 months ago

I hear a lot of what you're saying, and I agree to a large degree. What I don't think is so valid is what do we do with the 9 billion tons of plastic waste we already have? Reducing our need for oil with our current (bad) behavior is a start. Taking care of the mess we've made is also a huge win, even if it's converted into other, longer-lasting products, and assuming it doesn't require too much energy. Having a world where the bottom line isn't such a big factor would also help, and I'm not sure that will change quickly enough to help us out of this mess.

Totally a puff piece, though, and I'm not optimistic is will be energy-efficient enough to work.

[-] theluddite@lemmy.ml 2 points 7 months ago

That's why I say that antisolutions are context-dependent. This is being presented as the solution to plastic, not as a clean-up plan after we have banned plastic, or even while we ban plastic. The former is an antisolution, while the latter could be a responsible project. Antisolutions are dangerous because they deflate the political will necessary to actually solve the problem, not because the technology is problematic in and of itself.

this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2024
9 points (73.7% liked)

Solarpunk technology

2368 readers
3 users here now

Technology for a Solar-Punk future.

Airships and hydroponic farms...

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS