177
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2024
177 points (100.0% liked)
Games
16703 readers
772 users here now
Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)
Posts.
- News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
- Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
- No humor/memes etc..
- No affiliate links
- No advertising.
- No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
- No self promotion.
- No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
- No politics.
Comments.
- No personal attacks.
- Obey instance rules.
- No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
- Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.
My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.
Other communities:
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Warner Bros. having the artists take the L for management's poor decisions? They should be safe, that's totally not gonna happen /s
200-300 active players seems to be gamers' collective signal of, "fuck you for putting in stupid microtransaction live-service grindfests, you removed what makes games worth playing, so we ain't playin' them". Payday 3 is around the same level.
Remember kids: Management will never risk a damn thing and even when they do lose they’ll be ok because they put all your money into a rainy fund. And they’ll blame every single person but themselves.
I think the employees should get all the profits from the business, since they take on all the risk.
I'd wager that's the floor because a non-trivial portion of that 2-300 are bots or something.
Yeah, it could be the people that launch every game in their library once a day for cards or something.