35
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2024
35 points (71.1% liked)
politics
19107 readers
3040 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I mean...good luck. They have teams of people betting that you won't pull the trigger and vote for Trump. I also think your group won't. Kind of an empty threat.
"Ha, you have nowhere else to go! We can do whatever we want"
Pretty much.
Joining the Face Eating Leopard party is a fucking stupid alternative. Pushing for rank choice voting in their local and state elections to normalize 3rd parties is what can change things.
Not supporting the face nibbling party does not mean you're joining the face eating party, it means the face nibbling party needs to make real steps to stop nibbling on faces to get your vote back.
In a two party system where both options bad, voting against the option that wants to end democracy is your clearest route to one day electing a progressive. Not voting allows for one more vote for the guy that wants to end democracy to not be negated; to which point you’ll never have to concern yourself with voting again.
What a stupid system. No wonder America sucks.
Not sure which party you mean is saving democracy. The one suing to keep green party off state ballots, and that refused to primary a candidate with a 33% approval rating, or the other one.
I’m talking about the party that DID NOT send insurrectionists to the capital to attempt to keep their wanna-be-dictator in power after he lost. I’m talking about the party that does not want to end voting, that has forgiven some student debt, that hasn’t intentionally shifted more wealth to the richest among us, that wants to keep the EPA around so that there might actually be a future.
Trump, they're talking about Trump obviously. To read it any other way is disingenuous and if you genuinely think they may have been talking about Biden then you're delusional.
Trump should be in prison along with all of the insurrectionists from January 6th. He shouldn’t even qualify to hold office at this point.
The entire supreme court disagrees with you.
The Supreme Court agrees that a single state doesn’t get to change a presidential ballot. The GOP’s candidate is in fact a criminal and should not be on the ballot for that alone; but that’s the best they can bring to the table.
If there are no charges there is no crime
I guess you forgot about the E. Jean Carrol case that he was found guilty in. That’s just one… I like my presidential candidates to not have criminal records.
Keeping up his hard sometimes I know, but this thread was about the supreme Court decision in regards to keeping him on the ballot.
Tunnel vision eh? Another horse with blinders. My statement yesterday was that the GOP should have put up a candidate without a criminal background.
And the DNC shouldn't be offering up a candidate that's enabling ethnic cleansing.
Your original comment specifically mentioned ballots
And you’re mentioning the outcome of a Supreme Court decision that never happened. Don’t worry about the Great Replacement; you and the rest of your ilk of degenerates will still be able to find a seat at the back of the classroom indefinitely.
You mean this decision that never happened?
No, not that decision... this one is where the courts decided that individual states cannot remove him from the ballot. Where was this supreme court decision you mentioned that they decided he should not be in prison? You are clearly confused.
I never claimed SCOTUS said he shouldn't be in prison. SCOTUS rules on constitutionality of law, not criminal cases
https://i.ibb.co/SfpKqp3/ac.png
There’s also that pesky little $454 million dollar guilty verdict around the fraud case too.
Again, absolutely nothing to do with this thread
The leopards eat everyone’s face if they win. And in a first past the pole election, sitting out helps them eat all our faces.
The leopards win either way.
Holding them to account is the only way to change things.
Can't simultaneously hold them accountable and go to brunch
This really depends on what you mean by "not supporting" - are you speaking out against them, primarying them, advocating for better policies? I'm with you 100%... the issue is the camp that decides to protest vote Trump or not participate in the general election.
Our voting system is broken and in the general election your choices are Trump or Biden.
YOUR choices are Trump or Biden. I refuse to participate in a system that gives me no representation in government.
The refusal to primary came from the DNC, and our calls to challenge them or push for better policies go unheard
2 of the areas where RCV has been approved got sued to keep the choice off ballots.
That's not exactly how it works. People could get motivated to run for office and actually start changing the makeup of the Democrats. The leadership we have today stems from a very long of complacency. And our choices may be functionally limited to two groups. Their makeup isn't so limited.
There is no changing a system that's operating as designed. The only effective change will come from dismantling the DNC as a political party and allowing a new party to take its place.
Spoken like someone either ignorant to how things work. Or vested in them not working.
Anyone with a basic understanding of how it works would oppose it. It's an abusive good cop/bad cop relationship. In the end they are both cops sworn to uphold the white supremacist laws this country was founded on.