-43
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2024
-43 points (20.5% liked)
Conservative
357 readers
64 users here now
A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff
-
Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.
-
We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.
-
Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.
A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.
founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
He clearly mocked a disabled person. I’m not arguing that with you anymore. It’s in the video, clear as any other video. It’s your choice to pretend not to see it.
You’re just having to justify to yourself that isn’t what happened so you can’t be wrong.
Its reasons like this that explain perfectly why you get more dissent than agreement in this community. At least in past exchanges I’ve owned up when I was wrong and apologized. You so far have been incapable of that.
I would own up if I was wrong but as my citation shows, I am correct.
An opinion article on a conservative site is not making any points in your favor and the fact that you think that it’s enough to debunk a video of the thing actually happening is honestly really sad.
With as much as you like to trash talk liberals I would expect better debate skills from you. But I guess this is just how conservatives form arguments.
If I were to provide an opinion article from a liberal publication saying the exact opposite, would that then fully cancel out your point and put us back at square one? Or would you just continue denying the world around you?