this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2024
516 points (96.6% liked)

Technology

71502 readers
4699 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jaschen@lemm.ee 31 points 1 year ago (10 children)

This ban can't come soon enough. Fuck the CCP.

[–] endhits@lemmy.world 48 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

"In my household, the only addictive spyware we use is made in the USA!!!"

Edit: everyone below me is proving my point exactly.

[–] ealoe@ani.social 8 points 1 year ago

Unironically yes, at least the US government is something we can openly criticize and attempt to change while living within its borders. Try criticizing the Chinese government from within China, let me know how that works out for you. I'll take homegrown American spyware any day.

[–] Bonskreeskreeskree@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (5 children)

People love to repeat this, but US companies aren't coming from a place of hostile intent like china's special brand of tik tok for the states.

[–] KrapKake@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm not so sure about that, they seem pretty hostile to consumers and employees.

[–] endhits@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (3 children)

They're both focused on profit. The only reason you see the other one as scary is because it's owned by the scary scary Chinese. Red scare all over again.

[–] jaschen@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No tiktok is not focused on profit. It literally has one of the worst/non existent monetization systems.

[–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Yup, vine ripoff with some tweaks and the same monetization issue

[–] jaschen@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Case in point. Vine literally can't survive and so shouldn't TikTok. Unless of course it's getting propped up by a government with endless funds and not focused on profits.

[–] retrieval4558@mander.xyz 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why are you so convinced that an advertising platform that a 1/3rd of the country is glued to is unsustainable. And that's ignoring the rest of the world, which is the majority of their user base.

[–] jaschen@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

The same reason why twitter was NEVER profitable and it had more eyes glued to it. World presidents were using twitter for announcements. Never profitable.

[–] jorp@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What's the connection between Uber and China, then? I thought it was somewhat common for tech companies to be unprofitable for very long periods of time backed only by capital, but it may be China. Has anyone looked into this? Does Xi know what I like to order on weekends? Why haven't we banned this yet

[–] jaschen@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

I wouldn't consider Uber. This is closer to Vine vs TikTok. And we all know what happened to Vine.

[–] Bonskreeskreeskree@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Why is Chinese tiktok different than that in the states then?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)

Hmm, here's what Zuckerberg said when he launched Facebook:

According to SAI sources, the following exchange is between a 19-year-old Mark Zuckerberg and a friend shortly after Mark launched The Facebook in his dorm room:

Zuck: Yeah so if you ever need info about anyone at Harvard

Zuck: Just ask.

Zuck: I have over 4,000 emails, pictures, addresses, SNS

[Redacted Friend's Name]: What? How'd you manage that one?

Zuck: People just submitted it.

Zuck: I don't know why.

Zuck: They "trust me"

Zuck: Dumb fucks.

Brutal.

Could Mark have been completely joking? Sure. But the exchange does reveal that Facebook's aggressive attitude toward privacy may have begun early on.

They may not be trying to control elections (they certainly have their fingers in that pie too), but they're still hostile to users.

[–] admin@lemmy.my-box.dev 2 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Why would it matter whether or not it's intentional, if the end effect is the same?

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] K1nsey6@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Blaming tiktok for bad parental choices?

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm not saying it's a good parental choice. But the ban can help the kids.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I doubt it, parents will just move them to YouTube, Instagram, or some other platform. The TikTok ban is intended to limit misinformation by the CCP, and that doesn't really matter for this age of kids.

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm a parent. YouTube is watched but you can see what they are watching.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The more important thing to me is building habits. I care less about how much they're watching vs how they're spending their time generally.

We have a rule where our kids need to read to be able to watch/play games, and we cap at 2hr/day. If they read 1hr, they can watch/play for 30min. My kids seem to have a pretty good mix of reading, watching/playing, and playing outside w/ friends, so I think it works.

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yea. We do something similar. It's an electronic allowance. If you use it it's done for the day. I change it for rainy days and vacations if we are traveling in the car or whatever. But it's easy to set up with Google family. And then you can see what they are doing. Not to be snoopy. Just to teach them the right way to protect themselves online. I don't want them to turn 18 and be completely lost.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I give my kids 30 min "free" on Saturdays, which gets doubled if they spend it in a game with a sibling. For trips, I make my kids all do the same thing, so either watch the same show, listen to the same audiobook, etc.

I personally don't digitally track what my kids do at all, I instead rely on trust and keeping devices in a public space. I tell them what's acceptable, and occasionally hang out with them while they're doing whatever. As they follow the rules, I give them more autonomy (e.g. my oldest may get their own PC soon-ish), but if they break the rules, they lose access. The only parental controls I use is for my 4yo, because she keeps getting into my Steam Deck and Switch w/o asking, but my other kids know the passcode on the Switch (not my Steam Deck, that's mine).

It's a bit bumpy, but I'm hopeful that having rules but no actual walls teaches them to learn to self-regulate and will help them in the long-run. It worked for me as a kid.

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

My oldest is a gamer just like me. We hang out in discords. That's why I monitor him. It's not necessarily him or the friends I know about that worry me. It's the random pedo like people that can come from many games and many interactions.

The youngest just watches silly videos and doesn't have a gaming bone in her body. So I just try to make it fair. Since they both need time away.

[–] jaschen@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

No blaming the CCP on psyops on Americans.

[–] BruceTwarzen@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ah yes, that will solve the problem

[–] jaschen@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wait, is there another psyops software the CCP has deployed in the US?

[–] BlueJayOakerson@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Probably plenty. Tik tok is just the biggest owned by a foreign government that also is showing pretty immediate extreme negative effects on children’s attention spans and learning capabilities.

But people are still gonna whine because they’re 25 year olds who need to watch 80 videos of unboxing shoes in 4 minutes . That’s really the only pro tik tok argument there is.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] jorp@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Only Western manipulation please!

[–] jaschen@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's not in American businesses best interest overthrow a government. Can't say the same for the CCP tho. Fuck the CCP.

[–] jorp@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lol I hope that's a poor choice of words, maybe you MIGHT have a point if you specified the US government though even that isn't true https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_Plot

[–] jaschen@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Wow, that is literally 1 example of an obscure time in the early 19th century.

A mass majority of an American company has zero interest to hurt the community it is based in. The stability of a government and the strength of it's community determines if people would buy/use a product. It also supplies a competent workforce and a network of security that helps a company prosper.

load more comments (6 replies)