257
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 88 points 1 year ago

They can live, but it has to be on 60k a year, with all of their initial assets liquidated and used to support people in need.

[-] TooMuchDog@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

Look I'm all for taxing the wealthy, but saying we should force billionaires, or really anyone for that matter, to give up everything more than $60k/year is fucking laughably insane.

[-] Nepenthe@kbin.social 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Why, exactly? Only two years ago, 37.9 million people were below the poverty line, which is only $20k/yr. And that's only counting the US. If we can do it, they can do it.

If those making over $60k currently cannot make it work when so many of their own countrymen have been doing so for their entire lives, perhaps we need to talk. If nothing else, I can give you financial advice.

[-] xedrak@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

Nice red herring. The argument was that demanding a billionaire give up all of their money and live on a relatively small salary is absurd, and nothing you said refutes that.

[-] VenoraTheBarbarian@thegarden.land 15 points 1 year ago

Sounded to me like what they meant was basically as a friendlier option than death. What's absurd about it if you weren't saying it's too little to live on?

load more comments (15 replies)
this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2023
257 points (100.0% liked)

196

16508 readers
2340 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS