400
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Ashyr@sh.itjust.works 35 points 6 months ago

I'd never really heard the term NEET before and had to do some research. I get what is, but not really why it is.

Is it a lifestyle thing or a mental health thing?

[-] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 76 points 6 months ago

NEET is is an economic label that means Not in Employment Education or Training. Its the group often looked down on as leeches in society but the term doesn't consider the reasons or health of the person.

The sister in the post appears much more like the Japanese shutins or hikikomori who isolate themselves from all social contact. Technically being a hikikomori is a choice but mental health and big pressure culture probably dont help.

[-] crony@lemmy.cronyakatsuki.xyz 31 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

In most cases the culture and mental health are the reason a lot of them will choose that lifestyle, still not 100% by their own free will.

[-] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 13 points 6 months ago

Thats what i meant with “technically” a choice

The ironic part in this is that ecologically/footprint speaking the impact might be pretty positive compared to going out.

[-] crony@lemmy.cronyakatsuki.xyz 10 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Yea, here where I live there is a culture of most jobs being seasonal work, so a good amount of people end up being NEET's for about half a yera or less because of the lack of regular jobs and surplus of seasonal work that's most times only 3-6 month's long.

You could say we are forced to be neet's whenever tourist season isn't ongoing.

[-] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 9 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Thsts also what it was like it in medieval europe lord days. Peasants sow and harvested the lands but most of the year didn't have much to do.

Sounds alot better then the cant skip a paycheck or miss rent hustle culture.

[-] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 17 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Peasants sow and harvested the lands but most of the year didn't have much to do.

They usually ploughed two times before harvest, and had to harrow at least once. After the harvest you had to process it, so cleaning threshing and winnowing grain or cleaning fruits. You'd need to weed it, maybe even plough it again after sowing to flatten out the ground and cover the seed and bury the weeds. If you're lucky, you can add some manure and if you're unlucky you might to plough agaaaain to retain more water on the field.

Of course those staple crops are in addition to the vegetable and herb garden, and any animals that need care every single day.

And all of this is ignoring the housework, gathering firewood, cooking for today and preserving for winter, cleaning and mending clothes, making yarn and weaving fabric, down to simply fetching water. Just housework is a fulltime job (not 40 hours, but literally all the time) in de middle ages.

And if you fall Ill, break a leg, have a fire or just have a shitty dry summer, the general solution to that is dying slowly and painfully.

Subsistence farming sucks so hard, people worldwide literally chose indentured servitude as a preferable alternative on many occasions.

[-] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 12 points 6 months ago

Both sides are true.

Work itself was much harder and life itself could be called a struggle compared to today’s standards.

But the attitude towards works was very different and much more broken up. Leisure in medieval times is well documented.

“During times of high wages and good harvests, peasants could expect to work no more than 150 days a year.”

https://www.thecollector.com/peasant-life-medieval-england/

[-] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 11 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

“During times of high wages and good harvests, peasants could expect to work no more than 150 days a year.”

Ahhh this article again. It misses a hugely important bit of info: this work is ONLY for their lord. To translate it to a modern context:

During a brief period after the Plague, a peasant "only" had to work 150 days to "pay the rent". If they wanted to do stuff like stay warm, wear clothes and eat, that came on top of those 150 days.

[-] Fal@yiffit.net 5 points 6 months ago

I have no idea where this propaganda that is wasn't so hard being a feudal peasant came from but it's just laughable

[-] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 months ago

It's all the same anti enlightenment brain rot you see all over Lemmy. These people have convinced themselves that modernity is so terrible, they'd literally rather be slaves.

[-] Schmoo@slrpnk.net 3 points 6 months ago

It's just wishful thinking that the solution to our current dysfunctional relationship to labor can be found in the past, ultimately driven by a failure of imagination. Sure a medieval peasant's relationship to labor might have in some ways been better than today, but in most ways it was not. We can look at the past and learn from the positives only by acknowledging the negatives.

[-] MeDuViNoX@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 months ago

I know it's just a typo, but typing surplus like that makes me think of the type of Freudian slip a reptilian disguised as a human would have. 🤣

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (24 replies)
this post was submitted on 15 May 2024
400 points (96.7% liked)

Greentext

4391 readers
1095 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS