25
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by linucs@lemmy.ml to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

What I mean is: some boolean flags are perfect for the real world phenomenon they are representing e.g. is_light_on makes you understand perfectly that when it is true the light is on and when it is false the light is off.

There are other cases in which if you didn't write the code and you don't read any additional documentation, everything is not clear just by looking at the variable name e.g. is_person_standing, when true it's clear what that means but when false, is the person sitting? Lying? Kneeling?

I'm obviously not talking about cases in which there are more states, boolean would of course not be a good solution in those cases. I'm talking about programs in which there are only two states but it's not obvious, without external knowledge, which ones they are.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 14 points 6 months ago

In your example, it's implied that any pose other than standing is irrelevant in that context. Why do you need to care if you don't need to care?

[-] linucs@lemmy.ml 0 points 6 months ago

Maybe I explained myself poorly, what I was asking is about cases in which there are only two states e.g. standing and sitting and they are equally important so is_person_standing would not be a good name

[-] HandwovenConsensus@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Couldn't you just add a comment that says that if the variable is false, then the person is sitting?

Or if the programming language supports it, you could add a getter called is_person_sitting that returns !is_person_standing.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
this post was submitted on 15 May 2024
25 points (96.3% liked)

Asklemmy

43908 readers
1645 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS