submitted 5 months ago by bitahcold@lemmy.world to c/archlinux@lemmy.ml

19 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I was Nobara user, then I am using Fedora right now. I want to use things like Hyprland etc. and ya know, Its damn cool to say I am using arch btw. So I've decided to use Arch Linux. But everyone says its always breaking and gives problems. That's because of users, not OS.. right? I love to deal with problems but I don't want to waste my time. Is Arch really problemful OS? Should I use it? I know what to do with setup/ usage, the hardness of Arch is not problem for me but I am just concerned about the mindset "Arch always gets broken".

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] BaalInvoker@lemmy.eco.br 24 points 5 months ago

Who thinks that Arch always broke is one of the two:

An user that is trying to mess with the system always; or
A person that don't know Arch and is repeating non-sense

My Arch install has almost 5 years and I never had an issue that was like "oh no! O need to reinstall everything!"

Interesting enough, when I was using release-based distros, almost every big update my system become unstable and I had to reinstall me whole system.

[-] bitahcold@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago

As far as i see from the comments, I understood what i have to. I see that Arch has no problem in itself, the problem is user. I decided to install Arch on my pc finally. Thanks for your reply. Have a nice day.

load more comments (4 replies)

this post was submitted on 16 May 2024

13 points (76.0% liked)

Arch Linux

7175 readers

1 users here now

The beloved lightweight distro

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

k_o_t@lemmy.ml