357
submitted 6 months ago by sirico@feddit.uk to c/programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Empathy@beehaw.org 4 points 6 months ago

I want to add that, like you, I've become a big fan of restricting the numbers of ways to do something.

IMO, It's more time wasted choosing, more time wasted reviewing, and makes it easier to overlook errors. I want more opinionated languages and frameworks.

[-] NuclearDolphin@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 months ago

I reallt like the approach taken in Rust's borrow checker, where good, safe, and sometimes overbearing design choices are enforced by default, but you can explicitly declare exemptions. Makes identifying potential problem code blocks easy too.

this post was submitted on 16 May 2024
357 points (96.6% liked)

Programmer Humor

32479 readers
378 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS