857
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] kbin_space_program@kbin.run 126 points 5 months ago
  1. One of the points of the books is that the laws were inherently flawed.

  2. Given that we're talking about a Google product, you might have more success asking if they're bound by the Ferengi Rules of Acquisition?

[-] Idreamofcheesy@lemmy.world 18 points 5 months ago

IDK if I missed something or I just disagree, but I remember all but maybe one short story ending up with the laws working as intended (though unexpectedly) and humanity being better as a result.

Didn't they end with humanity being controlled by a hyper-intelligent benevolent dictator, which ensured humans were happy and on a good path?

[-] Zoot@reddthat.com 4 points 5 months ago

I thought it was Asiimovs books, but apparently not. Which one had the 3 fundamental rules lead to the solution basically being: "Humans can not truly be safe unless they're extinct" or something along those lines... Been a long time since I've explored the subjects.

[-] Adm_Drummer@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago

I mean... Kind of Asimov's robot series? Except the androids/robots were trying so hard to stay to the rules and protect humans but at every chance they could humans fucked that up or refused to see the plan.

At least as I recall, the robots basically came up with multi-millenia spanning plans that would solve all of humanity's problems and then humans were like: "Cool. But what if we made robots detectives and they could also target people we don't like?" Then the robots fucked off for a while and a bunch of stuff happened and... Yeah. Asimov wrote a lot of books.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
this post was submitted on 16 May 2024
857 points (97.6% liked)

Funny

6778 readers
307 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS