this post was submitted on 19 May 2024
466 points (100.0% liked)

196

18129 readers
783 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Randelung@lemmy.world 66 points 1 year ago (3 children)

If humans had tails we'd have clothes to hide and possibly restrain them and it would somehow be rude to move it. It just fits the whole self loathing much of the western world had going on for the last few centuries.

[–] WldFyre@lemm.ee 34 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Japan famous for their outgoing and expressive culture

[–] hydrospanner@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

And the middle east and their known long history of free expression.

[–] Randelung@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

True. I was picturing puritanism and the strongly religious, but they certainly don't have a monopoly on prudishness.

[–] Xanis@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago

Nah man, there would be some form of cultural disdain for types of tails. It would become another form of racism. Got your culture, looks, skin color, etc and at the end "tail type". There would be whole sociocultural wars started over tail length. People would go around hiding their tails claiming fashion forward practices to fit in.

Politicians would claim bus seats with holes aren't safe in order to put down the people who primarily use them. Activist groups would come out saying that pants with openings for tail comfort goes against the teachings of the Great Tailed God. Eventually there would be a change towards equality, though never justice. Beneath the false peace people would still be whispering and somehow those few with the "nicest" tails, born into fabulously-tailed families, would always have more privilege and often not understand how having a different tail can be an automatic disadvantage.

[–] Pretzilla@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

There is probably a good reason we don't - it evolved out because we seem to be benefited by hiding our emotions

Though the causal link might be the other way around - if we were better with dealing with expressed emotion we could have kept the tail

Could probably look at the taxonomy to see when we lost it and what happened to our tailed brethren

[–] Rozauhtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Other apes lost their tail as well, but they don't hide their emotions.

[–] Flummoxed@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do you have a source for that?

[–] Rozauhtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 year ago

Orangutan Jungle School.

[–] hydrospanner@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Or it has little to do with emotions at all and more to do with physical changes based on environment.

[–] Pretzilla@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

True, prehensile tails are super useful for swinging around in trees

I don't see why we wouldn't be able to control our tails, just as much as we can control our facial expressions.