17
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ekZepp@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago
[-] A_A@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

indeed:

The new claims from the “CCHP” group, asserting that the Hubble tension can be resolved by an in-between value for the expansion rate, are very troublesome for two reasons. First, there isn’t even a paper (not even an unpublished preprint) to refer to, where others in the community can see their work. But secondly and perhaps even more importantly, (...)

[-] remotelove@lemmy.ca 5 points 6 months ago

Using a quote with a cliffhanger is the newest form of evil.

[-] A_A@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

lol 😋 ...
Secondly (and now I say that from memory) that other group had a larger margin of error so their measurement should not be taken to disprove the Hubble tension.

this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2024
17 points (94.7% liked)

BecomeMe

767 readers
1 users here now

Social Experiment. Become Me. What I see, you see.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS