El Reg gets around to Nix drama (www.theregister.com)

submitted 6 months ago by flizzo@awful.systems to c/freeasm@awful.systems

14 comments fedilink hide all child comments

...except Liam can't decide whether to be a boomer or a piss baby about it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] taanegl@beehaw.org 2 points 5 months ago

I guess he has a Proven track record...

*pauses for laughter*...

Laugh, you bastards!

In any case, I think this guy misses the point regarding /nix/store naming conventions, particularly the dependency graph hash after every package name. This little brilliant thing basically tells you all you need to know about it's association. It's also part of why you can have several packages from several different closures without resorting to adding -1, -2, etc.

That being said, I have been eyeing Guix because of how the nix community was run... but let's see how things go.

this post was submitted on 17 May 2024

9 points (100.0% liked)

FreeAssembly

75 readers

1 users here now

this is FreeAssembly, a non-toxic design, programming, and art collective. post your share-alike (CC SA, GPL, BSD, or similar) projects here! collaboration is welcome, and mutual education is too.

in brief, this community is the awful.systems answer to Hacker News. read this article for a solid summary of why having a less toxic collaborative community is important from a technical standpoint in addition to a social one.

some posting guidelines apply in addition to the typical awful.systems stuff:

all types of passion projects and contributions are welcome, including and especially those that aren't programming or engineering in nature
this is an explicitly noncommercial, share-alike space
don't force yourself to do work you don't enjoy, or demand it of others

(logo credit, with modifications by @dgerard@awful.systems)

founded 7 months ago

MODERATORS

self@awful.systems