869
submitted 5 months ago by ZeroCool@vger.social to c/politics@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ZeroCool@vger.social 73 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

The GOP will be coming for Brown v Board of Education next, and you can bet your ass Clarence Thomas and the other right wing justices will be all for it.

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 26 points 5 months ago

I wonder if there will be a third school for Asian kids. Or do they go with black? Is it white and "other"?

[-] ZeroCool@vger.social 46 points 5 months ago

Schools? Oh, we won't have any of those when the GOP is done.

[-] kevindqc@lemmy.world 19 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Silly you. There will be Catholic schools to teach the bible, and to teach girls how to be good submissive housewives.

[-] riskable@programming.dev 41 points 5 months ago

No, actually. The current GOP stance on compulsory schooling is, "no". They really don't believe every child should be educated.

I'm not even talking about kids with special needs or "just minorities". They really don't believe in compulsory education. It's considered government overreach.

The ideal GOP educational system is 100% private and only those who can afford it get to go. They couldn't care less about literacy rates.

They want the Bible taught in schools but they don't want kids to actually read it. That would reveal what's in it (liberal stuff everywhere!), after all.

[-] jj4211@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago

It's one of those things that depends on the situation. As it stands, they want "no compulsory education", but it's because they don't like what the students will learn. However, if they could be assured that the compulsory education would be consistent with their views, then they would be all about compulsory education. No need to fear the Bible, there's plenty of "help" interpreting it available to people reading it...

Same on abortion rights. Currently the rhetoric is "well, it should be up to the states, not the federal government" but if they can ban it nationally, suddenly they would not be in favor of states like New York or California deciding for themselves.

[-] nifty@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Indirectly, this is why red states have the cheapest real estate values, but no one wants to move there. Economic value is literally centered around blue states, which have the highest literacy rates

[-] barsquid@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Charter schools with government funding.

[-] Chocrates@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

Other and white mean whatever the ones in power mean. I recently learned that Russians often don't see Caucasians (from the caucuses) as white.

[-] Natanael@slrpnk.net 7 points 5 months ago

Not long ago Irishmen weren't considered white

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

They were considered white n-word.

[-] slurpinderpin@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

I know at least where I'm from, these ghouls pretty much just hate black people.

[-] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Nah conservatives will be eager to put Asians in the "not white" category at the drop of a hat.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

I'm pretty sure they'll overturn Obergefell before Brown.

this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2024
869 points (99.5% liked)

politics

19120 readers
2920 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS