215

Apple seems to have persuaded OpenAI to work for exposure (www.engadget.com)

submitted 5 months ago by simplejack@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

32 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] 555@lemmy.world 37 points 5 months ago

Exposure = They get to keep the data they get.

Data = money

They’ve found a way to make it work I’m sure.

[-] nave@lemmy.ca 18 points 5 months ago

Apparently they won’t be collecting data.

Privacy protections are built in for users who access ChatGPT — their IP addresses are obscured, and OpenAI won’t store requests. ChatGPT’s data-use policies apply for users who choose to connect their account.

https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2024/06/introducing-apple-intelligence-for-iphone-ipad-and-mac/

[-] steal_your_face@lemmy.ml 21 points 5 months ago

They pinky promise not to collect the data

[-] nave@lemmy.ca 15 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I mean Apples the one saying it. I doubt OpenAI wants to piss them off.

[-] best_username_ever@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 months ago

How would Apple technically know that nothing is stored? Even if IPs are hidden, the questions and answers are still useful for OpenAI.

[-] nave@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 months ago

They probably have a deal similar to DuckDuckGo:

As noted above, we call model providers on your behalf so your personal information (for example, IP address) is not exposed to them. In addition, we have agreements in place with all model providers that further limit how they can use data from these anonymous requests that includes not using Prompts and Outputs to develop or improve their models as well as deleting all information received once it is no longer necessary to provide Outputs (at most within 30 days with limited exceptions for safety and legal compliance).

[-] steal_your_face@lemmy.ml 0 points 5 months ago

Yeah there’s definitely a contract, but open ai could determine it’s more profitable to void the contract and pay for lawyers and a settlement. Probably unlikely though to be fair.

[-] 555@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

I don’t believe that at all! There’s some kind of catch.

[-] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 5 months ago

Even if they don't sell the data I'm sure it's valuable for their models.

[-] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 0 points 5 months ago

This seems so obvious I'm amazed Apple isn't charging them for the "exposure"

[-] Telodzrum@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

Apple needs them just as badly as OpenAI needs every iPhone user. They're horribly behind in this "AI" bubble.

this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2024

215 points (96.1% liked)

Technology

59287 readers

4452 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS