1270
submitted 4 months ago by federino@programming.dev to c/steam@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] sep@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

I have read your arguments, I just fundamentaly disagree. I do not want to lower the ceiling until valve is as crappy as the rest. I want the floor to rise. Basically valve do not stop other companies from competing. Nothing is stopping EGS from including and contributing to proton. allowing and even helping developers to have their games on multiple marketplaces. Building awesome services to provide to developers.

[-] Spedwell@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Basically valve do not stop other companies from competing

So is there something you didn't understand that I can clarify, or are we in agreement that Valve needs to discard the PMFN policy?

[-] sep@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Is it a shitty businiss practice? Absolutly. Should valve as the only company allow others to under cut them? No that would be insane. Should it be regulated as illegal businiss practices for everyone - yes absolutly.

[-] Spedwell@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago
[-] sep@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

It is basically contractual price fixing. Staggering that the practice is allowed.

this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2024
1270 points (97.1% liked)

Steam

22 readers
21 users here now

Steam is a video game digital distribution service by Valve.

Steam News | Steam Beta Client news

Useful tools:
SteamDB
SteamCharts
Issue tracker for Linux version of Steam

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS