1102

submitted 5 months ago by schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de to c/xkcd@lemmy.world

725 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Alt text:

An idling gas engine may be annoyingly loud, but that's the price you pay for having WAY less torque available at a standstill.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] Emoba@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 5 months ago

The issue with this stance is that it's one of those all-or-nothing points of view. Sure it's better to have good public transportation, but in a lot of places there won't be for the foreseeable future. Sure it's better to use bicycles, but sometimes it's just not an option.

Electric cars won't fix traffic, but for the planet they're still a vast improvement. It's like a viable 95% solution that is dismissed because there might a 100% one somewhere in the next 200 years.

[-] blind3rdeye@lemm.ee 0 points 5 months ago

The issue with this stance is that it’s one of those all-or-nothing points of view.

Not it isn't. Every single individual person who decides to live without a car is an improvement. It doesn't have to be all or nothing.

[-] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I think they were trying to say that every individual who uses their car less is an improvement.

I live outside Boston, which has among the best transit in the US but it doesn’t take me everywhere. My town is quite walkable but also hilly and with weather. I do choose to walk, or ride the train when I can, but I still need a car. Improving this enough for most prople to dispense with cars will be a very long time. In the meantime, my use of EV, walk, train is a huge improvement of my brother in the Midwest using ICE car for everything

this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2024

1102 points (96.3% liked)

xkcd

8841 readers

3 users here now

A community for a webcomic of romance, sarcasm, math, and language.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

koraro@lemmy.world