143
submitted 5 months ago by naturalgasbad@lemmy.ca to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] kippinitreal@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago

In your guys opinion, is that good or bad? Privately funded would mean proprietary & profit driven implementation for such a crucial technology (if successful). I personally don't like it.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 27 points 5 months ago

The CPC still maintains a lot of influence over companies even when they're getting their funding from private industry as part of their "politics in command" strategy for controlling market forces. We'll see how it plays out.

[-] ours@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

Yep, if they need to disappear a CEO, no matter how big, they can and have done so in the past.

[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml 23 points 5 months ago

Won't somebody think of the CEOs!

[-] match@pawb.social 19 points 5 months ago

i don't know why you got a downvote, disappearinga CEO should be the most popular thing the ccp does

[-] frauddogg@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 5 months ago

Not to an Amerikan cosplay-capitalist lmfao. (I call them cosplay-capitalists because not a one actually owns capital; they just lap at the scraps that fall on the low-quarters of the c-suites they worship.)

[-] frauddogg@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 5 months ago

The billionaires deserve it tbh

[-] Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 5 months ago

Any path that takes us to unlimited clean energy is the right one IMO. We could always do a little espionage and make our own domestic fusion drive eventually.

[-] intensely_human@lemm.ee -4 points 5 months ago

I don’t mind profit driven because I’m confident that free markets are good for everybody.

[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 months ago
this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2024
143 points (84.2% liked)

World News

32347 readers
482 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS