87

I've been working on converting my gaming PC to Linux for a few weeks, but everything is running, but it all is just a little jankier than I would like.

I have an 8th gen Intel i7 and an Rtx 2070, running Arch linux.

Sometimes I boot up and my mouse doesn't work and I have to restart. Sometimes I launch games and they just don't launch right.

It feels like I'm doing a lot of work for no benefit. In fact, Elden ring runs way worse on my Linux partition than my Windows partition.

I've tried GE proton, gamemode, steam compatibility, everything... I'm sorry but I'm going to have to stick with Windows for gaming.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Voyajer@lemmy.world 54 points 6 months ago

Who the hell recommended Arch to you? Arch is for when you've been using Linux for a few years and have gotten bored waiting for the latest updates to hit your repos.

[-] Jambalaya@lemmy.zip -2 points 6 months ago

I use Linux at work, so I am a least familiar with how to tinker with it, but it just can't seem to find the right settings to get things running smoothly. I can't imagine a different distro would be any different.

[-] Voyajer@lemmy.world 28 points 5 months ago

The problem with Arch is that it's philosophy includes having to set up everything correctly yourself rather than each package you install already being set up and preconfigured the way you'd expect it to be in other distros. You shouldn't need to be fiddling with system stuff at all with something user focused like Pop!OS since I believe it even handles nvidia drivers for you. I wouldn't be using arch myself if I didn't have significant amounts of free time to invest into chasing down every little problem I encountered using it in college.

Linux is in a weird spot right now where the two ends of the user spectrum seem to be handled well while the middle still has issues since they're not already experts or just need an internet browser to be completely happy.

[-] CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world 22 points 5 months ago

I can’t imagine a different distro would be any different.

BZZZZZZZZZZZT I'm sorry but that answer was not correct. Next player!

Seriously try some of the other distros and you'll have a much more pleasant experience. I already recommended Tumbleweed in another reply but man, anything but Arch is gonna be an improvement for somebody trying to make the switch from Windows gaming for the first time.

[-] CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml 3 points 5 months ago

Yeah, I use TW and it just works. I game on it with no issues.

[-] CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Indeed. I haven't run into a modern game that it can't handle. The only thing it has struggled with that I play is old Command & Conquer titles, but that's a Proton issue.

[-] Para_lyzed@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Idk, I think Gentoo and Void would be worse for a new user. But yeah, most other distros will be more new user friendly. Bazzite has a great new user experience, for instance

[-] SolarPunker@slrpnk.net 12 points 5 months ago
[-] jjlinux@lemmy.ml 3 points 5 months ago

Bazzite is a good tinkering distro to get your feet wet into atomic distros, but in my experience, it's only a matter of time before it breaks. I've tried it in 3 different devices, including my steam deck, and they all broke by the 3rd or 4th update.

[-] SolarPunker@slrpnk.net 7 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

How? It's pretty solid on my PC. Breaking an immutable distribution isn't so easy, also Bazzite has a pretty easy install procedure.

[-] jjlinux@lemmy.ml 4 points 5 months ago

Apparently this one of those YMMV deals. Installation is painless and quick, for sure. And it does work fine (albeit a bit slower than Fedora Workstation when loading and firing up software). But after a few updates, Wayland stops working for some reason and I have to log into x11 instead.

I've no idea what the issue is, but I was only trying it, so I just went back to my trusty Fedora.

[-] amanda@aggregatet.org 2 points 5 months ago

The hell? This is precisely what atomic desktops were supposed to save us from!

[-] jjlinux@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 months ago

Atomic distros are still fairly new, so I expected issues and was not surprised. There's been a lot of progress done, sure, but I don't think we're "there" yet.

[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 1 points 5 months ago

Seconded. Also, Garuda "Dr4g0nized" is gaming focused and Arch under the hood, for a more traditional option.

[-] Nibodhika@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago

Linux at work and Linux for gaming are two very different beasts. For example, you didn't mention which drivers and DE (or WM) you're using which are the most crucial part to how games run, and both of which need to be manually configured on Arch but come pre-configured or are a couple clicks away in other distros.

[-] Anticorp@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

A different distro like Pop is completely different. My Pop gaming computer runs better than Windows on the same computer and didn't require any fiddling at all. It even comes with the latest stable Nvidia driver right out of the box, and you can upgrade it with the click of a button.

this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2024
87 points (79.2% liked)

Linux Gaming

15500 readers
461 users here now

Discussions and news about gaming on the GNU/Linux family of operating systems (including the Steam Deck). Potentially a $HOME away from home for disgruntled /r/linux_gaming denizens of the redditarian demesne.

This page can be subscribed to via RSS.

Original /r/linux_gaming pengwing by uoou.

Resources

WWW:

Discord:

IRC:

Matrix:

Telegram:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS