this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2023
141 points (98.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

8339 readers
261 users here now

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yeah, I kind of agree here. I think we should have a "playoff" system where candidates could pick a party for advertising purposes, but otherwise compete on an open playing field with all other candidates.

Here's how I'd like it to work:

  • ban all political ads, outside of informing when the next debate or rally will happen
  • all debates are funded with tax-payer dollars
  • for House seats, vote by party for the general election, and Reps would be elected proportionally and based on primary votes
  • Senate seats work as they currently do, except for the voting system change below
  • all votes are some kind of IRV system, e.g. ranked choice, approval, etc
  • there would be a vote after each primary debate (should have 3-5 of those), and if you don't participate, your previous votes carry forward through the primary process; candidates are eliminated if they go under some threshold; you could straight-ticket this, but it would weight all candidates from your party equally

This probably needs to be refined, but I think the general approach is worth discussing.

[–] doppelgangmember@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Nice, you got the ranked choice in there!

"Establishment hates this one simple trick!"

Lol. Ranked choice isn't my first pick, but I think it's an improvement. I'd prefer a bigger change than just the vote counting system though.